SAMHSA 2005 Budget

 

Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
Programs of Regional and National Significance

(Dollars in thousands)

Authorizing Legislation - Sections 506, 508, 509, 514 and 1971 of the Public Health Service Act

FY 2004  +/- 
FY 2003 Final FY 2005 FY 2004
Actual Conference Estimate Final Conf.
       
Programs of Regional and        
National Significance        
Best Practices
$53,331
$48,388
$48,429
+$41
Targeted Capacity Expansion
263,947
370,831
468,603
+97,772
PHS Evaluation (non-add)
---
---
(4,300)
+(4,300)
Total, CSAT
$317,278
$419,219
$517,032
+$97,813

2005 Authorization Expired

Purpose and Method of Operation
Programs of Regional and National Significance include CSAT's entire discretionary budget. These resources are CSAT's primary tool to focus Federal funding on particular service improvements and priority needs. Proposed funding reflects an increase of $98 million above the 2004 final Conference level. Funding will support 655 grants and contracts, with 491 continuation grants/contracts and 164 new/competing grants/contracts. Funds for all programs will continue to support evaluation and technical assistance.

In SAMHSA, there are two major program categories within Programs of Regional and National Significance. The first category promotes capacity expansion through services programs, which provide funding to implement a service improvement using a proven evidence based approach; and through infrastructure programs, which identify and implement needed systems changes. Key success indicators for most programs of this type are improved client outcomes, systems changes, and numbers of clients served. The second category promotes effectiveness through local best practice programs, which help communities and providers to identify, adapt, implement, and evaluate best practices; and service to science programs, which document innovative practices thought to have potential for broad service improvement. In general, the outcomes of these programs are measured by indicators such as the identification of a practice to be implemented and pilot adoption; satisfaction with information or assistance received; actual changes to practice that have occurred; and participant outcome data. In FY 2003, CSAT's Targeted Capacity Expansion programs served approximately 30,000 clients. Outcome data show positive results (see page GPRA 38). While many activities contribute to CSAT's accomplishments, several major programs account for the majority of funding.

As mentioned previously, an increase of $100.6 million is proposed for the Access to Recovery program for a total of $200 million in FY 2005. The SBIRT program will be funded at $25.7 million in FY 2005, including a $2 million increase for program evaluation. A description of these programs may be found later in this section.

Approximately $34 million are expended for programs that address the problem of homelessness among those with substance abuse disorders. As many as half of homeless adults have histories of alcohol abuse or dependence, and one third have histories of drug abuse. Many have a co-occurring mental illness. Accordingly, SAMHSA funds States and communities to provide mental health and substance abuse services specifically for homeless individuals.

Approximately $61 million are allocated for capacity expansion programs that provide outreach and substance abuse treatment for African American, Latino/Hispanic, and other racial and ethnic minority populations which have been disproportionately affected by substance abuse and HIV/AIDS. These services can reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS in these communities.

Approximately $26 million support programs that address the substance abuse treatment needs of adults and adolescents who become involved in the criminal justice system. Improved services can reduce the number of individuals entering or returning to jail or prison for reasons related to substance use disorders.

The CSAT PRNS program was selected for OMB PART review in FY 2004. The program was challenging to review because it is really a set of complex programs, many of which are relatively new. The program was found to be "Adequate" overall, but received a lower score on the "program results" section than on other sections. A corrective action plan focusing on that section as well as improving elements of other sections was developed and approved.

The corrective action plan focuses on the elements within each section of the PART which received low scores. The corrective action plan includes a PRNS management plan using GPRA data, with an emphasis on setting long term goals, improving data collection and evaluation, and increasing program monitoring to ensure that PRNS grantee targets are being met.

Over the past year, several changes have been implemented consistent with the corrective action plan. Web based data systems have been implemented to improve data collection, analysis, and reporting. To support new data systems and implement cost band measures, technical assistance has been provided to grantees. The milestone of evaluating the PRNS set of programs has been addressed in part by initiating evaluations of the major new ATR and SBIRT programs.

OMB recommended that incentive and disincentive procedures for grantees be developed to improve efficiency and cost effectiveness. Guidelines have been developed and implemented. Performance expectations on cost will be raised incrementally to improve efficiency. New milestones have been identified in this effort to improve program effectiveness and efficiency.

Funding for CSAT PRNS during the past five years has been as follows:

Funding FTE

2000....... $214,390,000 -
2001....... 255,985,000 -
2002....... 290,567,000 -
2003....... 317,278,000 -
2004....... 419,219,000 -

Rationale for the Budget Request

Treatment Capacity Priority Area
Capacity: Access to Recovery (Total funding: $200 million, of which $98 million is from the PRNS increase
.)

In FY 2004, $99.4 million will fund approximately 13 grants to States to support the new Access to Recovery (ATR) program. As envisioned, ATR will be a voucher program administered through the States. The initiative would allow individuals seeking clinical treatment and recovery support services to exercise choice among qualified community provider organizations, including those that are faith-based. An initial assessment will be conducted for each individual to determine the appropriate level of services for that individual, which would include a range of possibilities including recovery support services, brief interventions, and more intensive clinical treatment. In FY 2005, funding is proposed to total $200 million, half of which will be from the proposed PRNS increase. The increased funding is expected to support 13 additional grants.

The program's emphasis is on results - measured by outcomes in seven domains including decreased or no substance use, no involvement with the criminal justice system, attainment of employment or enrollment in school, family and living conditions, social support, access/capacity, and retention in services. The same domains will be used for the Performance Partnership (Block) Grants. At the proposed funding level, approximately 100,000 people will receive services through this program in FY 2005.

Capacity: Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral, and Treatment (Total funding: $25.7 million, of which $2 million is from PHS Evaluation funds.)

In FY 2003, $22 million were awarded for 7 grants to States and one technical assistance contract to increase treatment capacity and to improve treatment systems by expanding the continuum of care available in communities. Improvements are expected to result in increased access to clinically appropriate treatment matched to the person's stage of illness and problem severity. This investment will be continued in FY 2004.

In FY 2005, $2 million in PHS Evaluation funds are proposed to fund a contract for a major evaluation of SBIRT which will build on CSAT's data collection and reporting for Government Performance and Results Act purposes by addressing issues in the implementation of funded projects and their fidelity to grantee plans. The evaluation will document activities, accomplishments, and outcomes at the State level, the sub-recipient community level, and the provider agency level. Both a process and an outcome evaluation would be conducted. The process evaluation would focus on the number of clients screened, the population served, and the settings where services are performed. The outcome evaluation would focus on discerning the outcomes for the four covered population groups (screened only; screened and received brief intervention; screened and received brief treatment; and screened and received full treatment.) The results will allow SAMHSA to make any needed improvements in the program and to recommend the appropriate level of future investments in the program.

See Also:

PRNS Program Priority by Type (Best Practices)
PRNS Program Priority by
Type (Targeted Capacity Expansion)
Summary Listing of Activities

PART Corrective Action Plan