|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2003
|
Final
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Funding Sources
|
Actuals
|
Conference
|
Estimate
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Budget Authority:
|
|
|
|
| SAPT Block Grant 5% Setaside
|
$25,497 |
$9,757 |
$12,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
| PHS Evalution Funds:
|
|
|
|
| SAPT Block Grant
|
62,200
|
79,200
|
79,200
|
| Program Management
|
12,000
|
16,000
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Program Level
|
$99,697 |
$104,957 |
$107,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
| SAMHSA Component
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Office of Applied Studies
|
$63,469 |
$68,971 |
$68,536 |
| Budget Authority (non-add)
|
(14,926) |
(3,034) |
(2,749) |
| PHS Evaluation SAPTBG (non-add)
|
(36,543) |
(49,938) |
(49,787) |
| PHS Evalution Program Mgmt (non-add)
|
(12,000) |
(16,000) |
(16,000) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
|
26,840
|
25,367
|
28,457
|
| Budget Authority (non-add)
|
(6,710) |
(3,079) |
(3,567) |
| PHS Evaluation SAPTBG (non-add)
|
(20,130) |
(22,288) |
(24,890) |
| PHS Evalution Program Mgmt (non-add)
|
(---) |
(---) |
(---) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
|
9,388
|
10,619
|
10,619
|
| Budget Authority (non-add)
|
(3,861) |
(3,644) |
(6,096) |
| PHS Evaluation SAPTBG (non-add)
|
(5,527) |
(6,974) |
(4,523) |
| PHS Evalution Program Mgmt (non-add)
|
(---) |
(---) |
(---) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total, SAMHSA
|
$99,697 |
$104,957 |
$107,612 |
| Budget Authority (non-add)
|
(25,497) |
(9,757) |
(12,412) |
| PHS Evaluation SAPTBG (non-add)
|
(62,200) |
(79,200) |
(79,200) |
| PHS Evalution Program Mgmt (non-add)
|
(12,000) |
(16,000) |
(16,000) |
|
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
FY 2003
|
FY 2004 Final
|
FY 2005
|
|
Set-Aside Activities
|
Actual
|
Conference
|
Estimate
|
|
|
|
|
| State Data Systems |
|
|
|
| State Needs Assessments |
$2,369
|
$ ---
|
$ ---
|
| State Data Capacity Development: |
|
|
|
| State Data Infrastructure Grants (FY 2002-2004) |
3,400
|
3,450
|
---
|
| Block Grant Management Information |
708
|
740
|
740
|
| NASADAD State/PPG Infrastrucutre Planning Grants |
---
|
500
|
500
|
| Web Technology
|
2,031
|
1,380
|
---
|
| Integration of State and Federal Data Systems |
---
|
2,000
|
2,000
|
| State Data Strategy |
---
|
500
|
5,350
|
| Subtotal, State Data Systems |
8,508
|
8,570
|
8,590
|
|
|
|
|
| National Data Collection |
|
|
|
| NTOMS Contract Termination Costs |
1
|
---
|
---
|
| Replacement for NTOMS |
---
|
11,174
|
11,174
|
| Subtotal - National Data Collection
|
1
|
11,174
|
11,174
|
|
|
|
|
| Technical Assistance |
|
|
|
| State Systems TA Projects |
---
|
---
|
3,121
|
| Logistics Analytical Support |
---
|
1,227
|
1,530
|
| Tech. Assist.to States for Performance Partnership Program |
14,888
|
---
|
---
|
| FTE Support |
2,629
|
3,079
|
3,567
|
| Subtotal, Technical Assistance |
17,517
|
4,306
|
8,218
|
|
|
|
|
| Program Evaluation |
|
|
|
| Financing, Access and Cost Study |
314
|
341
|
44
|
| Integrated Data Analyses and Technical Assistance
|
---
|
438
|
431
|
| SAPTBG Program Evaluation Assessment |
---
|
150
|
|
| NASADAD Contract |
500
|
---
|
---
|
| Development of spending Estimates for MH/SAT
|
---
|
388
|
---
|
| Subtotal, Program Evaluation |
814
|
1,317
|
475
|
|
|
|
|
| TOTAL CSAT |
$26,840
|
$25,367
|
$28,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
FY 2004 |
|
|
|
FY 2003 |
Final
|
FY 2005 |
|
Set-Aside Activities |
Actual |
Conference |
Estimate |
|
|
|
|
| State Data Systems |
|
|
|
| SPS/MIS |
$1,812 |
$2,000 |
$2,000 |
| Subtotal, State Data Systems |
1,812 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
| Technical Assistance |
|
|
|
| State Reviews, TA and Analytic Support |
2,440 |
3,550 |
3,550 |
| Synar Program Analysis |
764 |
740 |
740 |
| Performance Partnership Grants and State Activities |
1,026 |
981 |
981 |
| Knowledge Dissemination |
1,807 |
1,500 |
1,500 |
| FTE Support |
1,539 |
1,848 |
1,848 |
| Subtotal, Technical Assistance |
7,576 |
8,619 |
8,619 |
|
|
|
|
| Program Evaluation |
|
|
|
| State Logis/Needs Assessment Coordination
|
--- |
--- |
--- |
| Subtotal |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
|
|
|
| TOTAL CSAP |
$9,388 |
$10,619 |
$10,619 |
|
Office of Applied Studies
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
|
FY 2003
|
Final
|
FY 2005
|
|
Set-Aside Activities
|
Actual
|
Conference
|
Estimate
|
|
|
|
|
| Program Totals |
|
|
|
| DAWN |
$11,633 |
$12,770 |
$13,111 |
| NSDUH (Household Survey) |
39,633 |
44,682 |
43,953 |
| DASIS |
8,511 |
8,485 |
7,820 |
| Data Archive |
890 |
--- |
904 |
| Other FTE/Operations |
2,802 |
3,034 |
2,749 |
| TOTAL OAS |
$63,469 |
$68,971 |
$68,536 |
|
|
Purpose and Method of Operation...
Funding for set-aside activities totals $107.612 million, including $12.412
million from direct funding for the block grant and $95.200 million from PHS
evaluation fund. The 5% set-aside of the Substance Abuse Prevention and
Treatment Block Grant (SAPTBG) supports data collection, technical assistance,
and program evaluation activities in CSAT, CSAP, and OAS. The SAPTBG set-aside
also supports State activities for State data, State technical assistance and
State evaluation. SAMHSA is the major source of national information in the
United States on the extent and nature of substance abuse, the supply and cost
of services for treating substance abuse, and the number and characteristics of
persons in treatment. Information from SAMHSA surveys and other activities
supported by the set-aside is used by the Department of Health and Human
Services, the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the Drug Enforcement
Agency, and State and local agencies to plan and evaluate programs to address
health and social problems.
The growth in national data activities and other necessary projects continues to
outpace the growth of the block grant set-aside. SAMHSA continues to prepare
for implementation of performance partnership grants that are heavily dependent
on data collection and analysis at both the state and national levels. To meet
multiple needs as efficiently and economically as possible, SAMHSA is ensuring
that to the extent possible, data requirements are aligned across programs.
Nonetheless, it has become necessary for SAMHSA to draw upon multiple funding
sources to accomplish activities that in theory could be funded by the
set-aside. These sources have included, varying from year to year, Public
Health Services Evaluation funds; program management funds; and PRNS funds in
addition to block grant set-aside funds.
Consistent with SAMHSA's data strategy vision, SAMHSA will invest in measuring
treatment outcomes for seven outcome domains consistently across all
discretionary and formula funded programs employing a pre/post design. States
and Territories will remain the key partner serving as a focal point for data
compilation from direct service providers located within their jurisdiction or
as the source of administrative data sets from which data will be extracted. As
State data capabilities improve, the corresponding Federal data reporting
programs will adjust to the common measures, improved reporting timelines, and
other capabilities.
|
|
During FY 2003, SAMHSA initiated actions to implement the Vision. A complete
review of the agency's data programs employing both internal and external
workgroups was initiated. While the effort is not completed, substantial
progress has been made. There is agreement with regard to addiction treatment
that data collected from both the PPG/Block Grant and the discretionary
programs must be uniform and well integrated, and work together to give a
complete picture of treatment success and efficiency. Further agreement has
been reached that treatment outcomes should be measured for seven domains:
Drug/Alcohol Use, Employment/Education, Crime and Criminal Justice, Family and
Living Conditions, Social Support, Access/Capacity, Retention. Specific
measures for each of the seven outcome domains have been defined and will be
published as Appendix C to the new Access to Recovery Program. Beginning in FY
04, CSAT and OAS will begin bringing their existing treatment data sets into
alignment with the seven outcome measures and the pre/post design.
As acknowledged in the data vision, Federal reporting programs such as TEDS are
constructed from State administrative data sets. To achieve the improvements in
measurement, timeliness, and a pre/post design that SAMHSA desires, State data
definitions, collection protocols, computer software, and analysis capabilities
must be improved.
CSAT will have the lead in developing the required improvements for State data
systems. The Technical Assistance to States for Performance Partnership project
and other mechanisms as appropriate to individually assess the current
capabilities of States and develop a plan to bring their data capabilities to
the performance levels required by SAMHSA. These capabilities would include the
seven common outcome measures and the ability to match records across programs
and over time. CSAT's Web Technology contract has completed development of
software for States to use to collect and manage data from their funded direct
service providers thus expanding the information technology choices available
to States. This software supports implementation of the outcome measures and a
pre/post evaluation design. The Web Technology program offers the States an
additional option to improve software capabilities to collect, compile, and
manage data from direct service providers on admission and discharges in near
real time. These resources should significantly increase the number of States
that can report discharge data and the timeliness with which States can report
to SAMHSA. FY 2005 program efforts will shift from development and testing to
installation and operational support within States through the continuing Web
Technology program and the State Data Capacity program.
|
|
OAS' DASIS/TEDS program will need to be brought into alignment with the seven
common outcome measures as States implement the measures and the data
management software. OAS is beginning to anticipate these developments in
project management and planning.
Following termination of the original NTOMS contract, as part of the
comprehensive review of all data programs, SAMHSA convened an outside group of
senior scientists knowledgeable of the addiction outcome scientific literature,
measurement, research designs, and sampling. ONDCP and SAMHSA agreed to the
composition of the group. The group was charged with reviewing competing
research designs for a national addiction treatment outcome monitoring system
and developing a consensus recommendation for a research design for the
Administrators consideration. The group is nearing completion of their final
report. Approximately $22 million will be reserved for implementation of the
design ultimately selected for a national outcome monitoring program for the
next two years.
Rationale for the Budget Request
Funding available for set-aside activities will increase by $2.655 million over
the FY 2004 Final Conference Action, from $104.957 million to $107.612 million.
The OAS activities will decrease by $.435 million and CSAT activities will
increase by $3.090 million. Funding from direct appropriation increases by
$2.655, from $9.757 million to $12.412 million. Total funding of $95.200
million from the PHS evaluation fund is the same level as the FY 2004 Final
Conference Action. This includes two transfers from the PHS evaluation fund:
$16 million to program management for national surveys and $79.200 million to
the SAPT block grant for data, technical assistance and evaluation activities.
Funding from the PHS evaluation fund will account for approximately 88% of
set-aside activities in FY 2005.
|
|
Accountability: Substance Abuse State Data Capacity Program. The
FY 2005 Budget set-aside allocation to CSAT includes a total of $8.6 million
for a State Data Capacity Program, which includes $6.6 million for State Data
Strategy and continues Integration of State and Federal Data Systems begun in
FY 2004. Because PART, GPRA, and the transition to Performance Partnership
grants place new demands on data collection beyond descriptive statistics,
States need infrastructure support to collect data that are sufficiently
reliable and valid to be used for budget and other program management decisions
at the State and Federal levels.
The proposed program will allow SAMHSA to support States in measuring treatment
outcomes for seven outcome domains consistently across all discretionary and
formula funded programs using a pre/post design. This program will be carried
out via contracts, not grants. States and Territories will remain the key
partner serving as a focal point for data compilation from direct service
providers located within their jurisdiction or as the source of administrative
data sets from which data will be extracted. As State data capabilities
improve, the corresponding Federal data reporting programs will adjust to the
common measures, improved reporting timelines, and other capabilities.
During FY 2004, CSAT and OAS will begin to bring their existing treatment data
sets into alignment with the seven outcome measures and the pre/post design. In
FY 2005, SAMHSA will begin to award contracts to implement needed systems and
to obtain the data.
|
|
 |
|