Posted on September 21, 2009 09:09
Categories: Legislative and Regulatory Issues | Employer and Individual Insurance
Topics: Cost-effectiveness | Employer-Sponsored Coverage | Health Care Reform | Individual Coverage | Spending
This report examines three health care reform plans to determine their level of administrative savings. Commonwealth found that including a public plan in an insurance exchange would save $265 billion in administrative costs over 10 years and an insurance exchange with only private plans would save $32 billion over the same period.
From the report:
The United States leads all industrialized countries in the share of national health care expenditures devoted to insurance administration. The U.S. share is over 30 percent greater than Germany’s and more than three times that of Japan. This issue brief examines the sources of administrative costs and describes how a private–public approach to health care reform—with the central feature of a national insurance exchange (largely replacing the present individual and small-group markets)—could substantially lower such costs. In three variations on that approach, estimated administrative costs would fall from 12.7 percent of claims to an average of 9.4 percent. Savings—as much as $265 billion over 2010–2020—would be realized through less marketing and underwriting, reduced costs of claims administration, less time spent negotiating provider payment rates, and fewer or standardized commissions to insurance brokers.
Full report: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/Publications/Issue-Briefs/2009/Jul/How-Health-Care-Reform-Can-Lower-the-Costs-of-Insurance-Administration.aspx
The Commonwealth Fund. (2009). How Health Care Reform Can Lower the Cost of Insurance Administration. Collins, S.R., Nuzum, R. Rustgi, S., Mika, S., Schoen, C., Davis, K., & Hollander, C. (editor).
E-mail to Friend |
Print |
Permalink |
Post RSS