Posted on August 14, 2009 16:20
Categories: Legislative and Regulatory Issues | Employer and Individual Insurance
Topics: Cost-effectiveness | Employer-Sponsored Coverage | Health Care Reform | Individual Coverage | Spending
This Urban Institute report, published June 26, 2009, examines the necessity of a public plan component within broader health care reform efforts.
From the report:
This paper makes the argument that a public plan is important to health reform because it will contribute to cost containment, primarily by addressing problems caused by increased concentration in insurance and hospital markets. We describe how the public plan might be structured, how many people might be expected to enroll, and how much money the public plan might save. We discuss the most frequent arguments that are made in opposition to the public plan. We conclude that the private insurance industry would survive at about the same size but be more efficient and more effective in controlling health care spending.
Full Report: Is the Public Plan Option a Necessary Part of Health Reform? (PDF | 154.26 KB)
The Urban Institute. (2009). Is the public plan option a necessary part of health reform? Holahan, J. and Blumberg, L.J.
E-mail to Friend |
Print |
Permalink |
Post RSS