Posted on December 17, 2008 10:32
Categories: Mental Health | Employer and Individual Insurance | Legislative and Regulatory Issues | Substance Abuse
Topics: Employer-Sponsored Coverage | FEHBP | Legislation (National) | Managed Care | Mental Health | Parity | Spending | Substance Abuse | Regulation
This paper examined the comprehensive parity requirements in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program to inform the wider parity debate. The authors found that federal plans were more likely to utilize carve outs via managed behavioral health care contracts than plans unaffected by parity. This strategy limited the effect of parity on total spending.
Barry, C. L., & Ridgely, M. S. (2008). Mental health and substance abuse insurance parity for federal employees: how did health plans respond? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(1): 155-70. DOI: 10.1002/pam.20311. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117357292/abstract
Authors: Colleen L. Barry, M. Susan Ridgely
E-mail to Friend |
Print |
Permalink |
Post RSS