(image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Skip To Content
(image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (image) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Quick Search
Financing Center of Excellence

The Benefits of Care Coordination: A Comparison of Medicare Fee-for-Service and Medicare Advantage

Categories: |

Topics: Managed Care | Medicare | Quality | Rates/Reimbursement | Seniors | Spending

This study conducted by Johns Hopkins University professor Gerard Anderson and sponsored by the Alliance of Community Health Plans (ACHP) compares hospital readmissions and preventable hospitalizations under Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) plans and Medicare Advantage (MA) plans offered by ACHP organizations.  The study found that, for 2007, 12 of 13 ACHP plans had readmission rates lower than the national average of 18.6 percent, ACHP plans had 86 percent fewer preventable emergency admission than the national average, and ACHP plans had preventable inpatient hospitalization rates that were 13 percent of the national average.  Anderson also calculated potential savings that Medicare could realize if Medicare FFS plans had rates proportional to ACHP’s plans. 

From the report:

Members of Congress, the Administration, and others such as the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), have expressed specific concern that, in the Medicare fee-for-service program, hospital readmission rates are too high and that a lack of care coordination is causing unnecessary hospitalizations. The Alliance of Community Health Plans (ACHP) asked Dr. Gerard Anderson, Professor at Johns Hopkins University, to undertake a study examining hospital readmissions and preventable hospitalizations in order to compare the rates in fee-for service Medicare to the rates in the Medicare Advantage plans offered by ACHP member organizations. The study also estimates the possible cost savings if Medicare fee-for-service had the same rates of readmissions and preventable hospitalizations as ACHP member health plans. ACHP members are regional and community-based health plans across the country that emphasize coordination of care, integrated systems, and close plan/provider relationships.

The three measures used in the study – hospital readmissions within 30 days, preventable hospitalizations and preventable emergency department (ED) visits – reflect access to primary care, care coordination, and other active management of patients. 

  • Reducing hospital readmissions – measured in this study as return visits for any reason within 30 days – requires coordination among the hospital, ambulatory care clinicians, other service providers, and the beneficiary following discharge.
  • Preventable hospitalizations and preventable emergency department visits are hospitalizations or ED visits that could have been prevented if there had been appropriate care for these "ambulatory care-sensitive conditions" (ACSCs). (ACSCs include such conditions as pneumonia, coronary artery disease, asthma, and diabetes.) This often requires coordination involving a wide range of clinicians and the Medicare beneficiary.

Full report: http://www.achp.org/policy/health_care_reform/study_of_ma_plans_vs_ffs/index.1.htmlexit disclaimer small icon  

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Alliance of Community Health Plans. (2009). The benefits of care coordination: a comparison of Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage. Anderson, Gerald.


E-mail to Friend | Print | Permalink | Post RSSRSS comment feed