National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS): 2019
Data on Mental Health Treatment Facilities
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Acknowledgments
This report was prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Work was performed under Contract No. HHSS283201600001C. The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) at SAMHSA/CBHSQ was Nichele Waller.
SAMHSA complies with applicable federal civil rights laws and does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, or sex. SAMHSA cumple con las leyes federales de derechos civiles aplicables y no discrimina por motivos de raza, color, nacionalidad, edad, discapacidad o sexo.
Public Domain Notice
All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA. Citation of the source is appreciated. However, this publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific, written authorization of the Office of Communications, SAMHSA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Recommended Citation
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS): 2019. Data on Mental Health Treatment Facilities. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2020.
Electronic Access of the Publication
This publication may be downloaded at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/data-we-collect/n-mhss-national-mental-health-services-survey.
Originating Office
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15SEH03
Rockville, Maryland 20857
July 2020
Table of Contents
Cover Page
Acknowledgments
List of Tables
List of Figures
Highlights
Chapter 1. Description of the National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS)
Chapter 2. Trends in Facility Characteristics
Chapter 3. Facility Characteristics and Services
Chapter 4. Selected Facility Characteristics at the Regional and State Levels
Chapter 5. Veterans Affairs Facilities
Appendix A. 2019 N-MHSS Questionnaire
Appendix B. Data Collection Procedures
Appendix C. Response Rates
Appendix D. List of Contributors
List of Tables
Description of the National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS)
1.1 N-MHSS facilities, by status and mode of response: 2019
Trends in Facility Characteristics
2.1 Facility turnover: Number and column percent distribution, 2015–2019
2.2 Facility operation: Number and column percent distribution, 2015–2019
Facility Characteristics and Services
3.1 Mental health treatment facilities, by service setting and facility type: Number and percent distribution, 2019
3.2 Mental health treatment facilities, by facility operation and facility type: Number and column percent distribution, 2019
3.3a Mental health treatment facilities that offer various treatment approaches, by facility type: Number, 2019
3.3b Mental health treatment facilities that offer various treatment approaches, by facility type: Row percent distribution, 2019
3.4a Mental health treatment facilities that offer specific services and practices, by facility type: Number, 2019
3.4b Mental health treatment facilities that offer specific services and practices, by facility type: Row percent distribution, 2019
3.5 Mental health treatment facilities that accept specific age groups for treatment, by facility type: Number and percent, 2019
3.6a Mental health treatment facilities that offer treatment programs or groups designed exclusively for specific client groups, by facility type: Number, 2019
3.6b Mental health treatment facilities that offer treatment programs or groups dedicated or exclusively designed for specific client categories, by facility type: Row percent distribution, 2019
3.7 Mental health treatment facilities that offer treatment services in a language other than English and in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing, by facility type: Number and row percent distribution, 2019
3.8 Mental health treatment facilities that employ a crisis intervention team, by facility type: Number and row percent distribution, 2019
3.9a Mental health treatment facilities that accept a specific type of payment or funding source, by facility type: Number, 2019
3.9b Mental health treatment facilities that accept a specific type of payment or funding source, by facility type: Row percent distribution, 2019
3.10 Mental health treatment facilities, by smoking policy and facility type: Number and row percent distribution, 2019
3.11a Mental health treatment facility licensing, certification, or accreditation, by facility type: Number, 2019
3.11b Mental health treatment facility licensing, certification, or accreditation, by facility type: Row percent distribution, 2019
Selected Facility Characteristics at the Regional and State Levels
4.1 N-MHSS facilities, by status, response rate, mode of response, and state or jurisdiction: 2019
4.2a Mental health treatment facilities, by facility type, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Number, 2019
4.2b Mental health treatment facilities, by facility type, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
4.3a Mental health treatment facilities, by facility operation, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Number, 2019
4.3b Mental health treatment facilities, by facility operation, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
4.4a Mental health treatment facilities that provide 24-hour hospital inpatient treatment settings, by facility type, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Number, 2019
4.4b Mental health treatment facilities that provide 24-hour hospital inpatient treatment settings, by facility type, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
4.5a Mental health treatment facilities that provide 24-hour residential treatment settings, by facility type, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Number, 2019
4.5b Mental health treatment facilities that provide 24-hour residential treatment settings, by facility type, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
4.6a Mental health treatment facilities that provide less-than-24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment settings, by facility type, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Number, 2019
4.6b Mental health treatment facilities that provide less-than-24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment settings, by facility type, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
4.7a Mental health treatment facilities that provide less-than-24-hour outpatient treatment settings, by facility type, Census region, and state or jurisdiction:
Number, 2019
4.7b Mental health treatment facilities that provide less-than-24-hour outpatient treatment settings, by facility type, Census region, and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
4.8a Treatment approaches offered, by Census region and state or jurisdiction:
Number, 2019
4.8b Treatment approaches offered, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
4.9a Mental health treatment facilities that offer specific services and practices, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Number, 2019
4.9b Mental health treatment facilities that offer specific services and practices, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
4.10 Mental health treatment facilities that accept specific age groups for treatment, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Number and row percent distribution, 2019
4.11a Mental health treatment facilities that offer treatment programs or groups designated or designed exclusively for specific client categories, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Number, 2019
4.11b Mental health treatment facilities that offer treatment programs or groups designated or designed exclusively for specific client categories, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
4.12 Mental health treatment facilities that offer treatment services in a language other than English and in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Number and row percent distribution, 2019
4.13 Mental health treatment facilities that employ a crisis intervention team, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Number and row percent distribution, 2019
4.14a Mental health treatment facilities that accept a specific type of payment or funding source, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Number, 2019
4.14b Mental health treatment facilities that accept a specific type of payment or funding source, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
4.15a Mental health treatment facility licensing, certification, or accreditation, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Number, 2019
4.15b Mental health treatment facility licensing, certification, or accreditation, by Census region and state or jurisdiction: Row percent distribution, 2019
Veterans Affairs Facilities
5.1 Suicide prevention-related services provided by Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities: Number and column percent distribution, 2019
5.2 Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities with suicide prevention-related staff:
Number, 2019
Appendix C
C1 Item response rates, by question number and description: 2019
List of Figures
Facility Characteristics and Services
1. Facility type: 2019
2. Facility operation: 2019
3. Service settings: 2019
4. Age groups accepted for treatment: 2019
5. Facilities that offered programs for persons with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders, by facility type: 2019
6. Types of payment or insurance accepted, by facility type: 2019
7. U.S. Census regions and divisions
8. States in which 40 percent or more of all mental health treatment facilities were outpatient mental health facilities: 2019
9. States in which 80 percent or more of all mental health treatment facilities were operated by private non-profit organizations: 2019
10. Mental health treatment facilities that offered psychiatric emergency walk-in services, by region: 2019
11. Mental health treatment facilities that accepted clients of all ages for treatment, by region: 2019
12. Mental health treatment facilities that offered dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs or groups for persons with post-traumatic stress disorder, by region: 2019
13. Mental health treatment facilities that offered treatment services in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing, by region: 2019
14. Mental health treatment facilities that accepted Medicare, by region: 2019
Highlights
Trends in Facility Characteristics
Facility Characteristics and Services
Selected Facility Characteristics at the Regional and State Levels
This report presents findings from the 2019 National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS), an annual census of all known facilities in the United States, both public and private, that provide mental health treatment services to people with mental illness.
Planned and directed by the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (CBHSQ) of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the N-MHSS is designed to collect data on the location, characteristics, and utilization of organized mental health treatment services for facilities within the scope of the survey throughout the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other jurisdictions.
It is important to note that values in charts, narrative lists, and percentage distributions are calculated using actual raw numbers and rounded for presentation in this report; calculations using rounded values may produce different results.
- In 2019, the response rate among facilities eligible to complete the survey was 91 percent [Table 1.1].
- A total of 12,712 facilities completed the survey. After excluding 240 facilities, data from 12,472 eligible respondent facilities were included in this report [Table 1.1].
Trends in Facility Characteristics 2015–2019
- There was a net increase of 790 eligible responding facilities between 2018 and 2019, from 11,682 to 12,472 facilities [Table 2.1].
- Private non-profit organizations operated 63 percent of facilities in 2015 and 61 percent in 2019; private for-profit organizations operated 18 percent of facilities in 2015 and 20 percent of facilities in 2019 [Table 2.2].
Facility Characteristics and Services
- Mental health treatment facilities could offer services in more than one type of service setting (e.g., inpatient, residential, outpatient). Of all mental health treatment facilities, 78 percent offered less-than-24-hour mental health treatment services in outpatient settings [Table 3.1].
- Approximately 42 percent of mental health treatment facilities were outpatient facilities
[Table 3.2].
- Of all mental health treatment facilities, 81 percent were privately owned: 61 percent were operated by private non-profit organizations and 20 percent were operated by private for-profit organizations [Table 3.2].
- More than 99 percent of psychiatric hospitals, general hospitals with a separate psychiatric unit, and 94 percent of Veterans Affairs medical centers provided psychotropic medication therapy [Table 3.3b].
- Programs or groups designated or exclusively designed for persons 18 years and older with serious mental illness were offered by 49 percent of mental health treatment facilities; 50 percent of all facilities offered programs or groups designated or exclusively designed for persons with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders [Table 3.6b].
- Most mental health treatment facilities accepted Medicaid (88 percent) or cash or self-payment (84 percent) for services [Table 3.9b].
Selected Facility Characteristics at the Regional and State Levels
- California and New York had the largest total numbers of mental health treatment facilities
(952 and 860 facilities, respectively). There were three other states that had more than 500 facilities each: Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida (616, 585, and 520 facilities, respectively). These five states combined accounted for 28 percent of all mental health treatment facilities that responded to the survey in 2019 [Tables 4.2a–b].
- Private non-profit organizations operated 61 percent of all mental health treatment facilities. The Census region with the largest proportion of mental health treatment facilities operated by private non-profit organizations was the Northeast (74 percent), followed by the Midwest (68 percent), West (57 percent), and South (50 percent). There were 10 states/jurisdictions in which more than 80 percent of all mental health treatment facilities were operated by private non-profit organizations [Tables 4.3a–b and Figure 9].
- Private for-profit organizations operated 20 percent of all mental health treatment facilities. The Census region with the largest proportion of mental health treatment facilities operated by private for-profit organizations was the South (27 percent), followed by the West, Midwest, and Northeast (24 percent, 16 percent, and 11 percent, respectively) [Tables 4.3a–b].
- In 10 states/jurisdictions, less than 40 percent of facilities provided 24-hour mental health treatment services in an inpatient setting through a general hospital (Nevada, Delaware, Arizona, Puerto Rico, Texas, Washington, Alaska, South Dakota, Florida, and Indiana) [Table 4.4b].
- The dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs or groups most commonly offered by facilities were for persons with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders (50 percent), persons 18 years and older with serious mental illness (49 percent), persons who have experienced trauma (excluding persons with a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis) (45 percent), and persons with post-traumatic stress disorder (42 percent) [Tables 4.11a–b].
- The proportion of mental health treatment facilities that provided treatment services in languages other than English was 73 percent, ranging from 70 percent in the Midwest and Northeast, each, to 80 percent in the West. Staff provided treatment services in Spanish at 51 percent of facilities in the West, 39 percent in the Northeast, 27 percent in the South, and 19 percent in the Midwest [Table 4.12].
Chapter 1. Description of the National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS)
Data Collection Procedures for the 2019 N-MHSS
Content
Facility Reporting and Selection for the 2019 N-MHSS Report
Quality Assurance
Response Rates
Data Considerations and Limitations
Organization of the Report
This report presents findings from the 2019 National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS) conducted from March 2019 through November 2019. The N-MHSS collects information from all known facilities within the scope of the survey in the United States, both public and private, that provide mental health treatment services to people with mental illness. The Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (CBHSQ) of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, plans and directs the N-MHSS.
The N-MHSS provides a mechanism for quantifying the dynamic character and composition of the U.S. mental health treatment delivery system. It is the only source of national- and state-level data on the mental health services delivery system reported by both publicly and privately operated specialty mental health treatment facilities. The N-MHSS is designed to collect data on the location, characteristics, and utilization of organized mental health treatment services for facilities within the scope of the survey throughout the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other jurisdictions. The N-MHSS complements, but does not duplicate, the information collected through SAMHSA’s survey of substance abuse treatment facilities, the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS).
The objective of the N-MHSS is to collect data that can be used to:
- assist SAMHSA and state and local governments in assessing the nature and extent of services provided in state-funded, state-operated, private non-profit, and for-profit mental health treatment facilities, and in forecasting mental health treatment resource requirements;
- update SAMHSA’s Inventory of Behavioral Health Services (I-BHS), an inventory of all known mental health and substance abuse treatment facilities in the United States, which can be used as a frame for future surveys of these facilities;
- describe the nature and scope of mental health treatment services and conduct comparative analyses for the nation and states; and
- update the information in the mental health component of SAMHSA’s online Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator, which includes a searchable database of public and private facilities for the provision of mental health treatment. The Locator is available at https://findtreatment.samhsa.gov.
Data Collection Procedures for the 2019 N-MHSS
Field period and reference date
The field period for the 2019 N-MHSS, which included mailing and data collection operations, ran from March 26, 2019, through November 30, 2019. The reference date was April 30, 2019.
Survey universe
The survey universe for the 2019 N-MHSS included 14,936 facilities across the United States and other jurisdictions [Table 1.1]. Most facilities in the 2019 N-MHSS frame were identified from the updated database produced after fielding the 2010 and 2014 N-MHSS, and further supplemented by the 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 mental health augmentations, as well as by new facilities that states requested be added to the I-BHS.
Survey coverage
The following types of mental health treatment facilities were included in the 2019 N-MHSS:
- Psychiatric hospitals are facilities licensed and operated as either state/public psychiatric hospitals or as state-licensed private psychiatric hospitals that primarily provide 24-hour inpatient care to persons with mental illness. They may also provide 24-hour residential care and/or less-than-24-hour care (i.e., outpatient, partial hospitalization/day treatment), but these additional service settings are not requirements.
- General hospitals with a separate inpatient psychiatric unit are licensed general hospitals (public or private) that provide inpatient mental health services in separate psychiatric units. These units must have specifically allocated staff and space for the treatment of persons with mental illness. The units may be located in the hospital itself or in a separate building that is owned by the hospital.
- Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers are facilities operated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, including general hospitals with separate psychiatric inpatient units, residential treatment programs, and/or psychiatric outpatient clinics.
- Partial hospitalization/day treatment mental health facilities provide only partial-day mental health services to ambulatory clients, typically in sessions of three or more hours on a regular schedule. A psychiatrist generally assumes the medical responsibility for all clients and/or for the direction of their mental health treatment.
- Outpatient mental health facilities provide only outpatient mental health services to ambulatory clients, typically for less than three hours at a single visit. A psychiatrist generally assumes the medical responsibility for all clients and/or for the direction of their mental health treatment.
- Residential treatment centers (RTCs) for children are facilities not licensed as psychiatric hospitals that primarily provide individually planned programs of mental health treatment in a residential care setting for children under age 18 years. (Some RTCs for children may also treat young adults.) RTCs for children must have a clinical program that is directed by a psychiatrist, psychologist, social worker, or psychiatric nurse who has a master’s or doctoral degree.
- Residential treatment centers (RTCs) for adults are facilities not licensed as psychiatric hospitals that primarily provide individually planned programs of mental health treatment in a residential care setting for adults.
- Multi-setting mental health facilities provide mental health services in two or more service settings (non-hospital residential, plus either outpatient and/or day treatment/partial hospitalization), and are not classified as a psychiatric hospital, general hospital, medical center, or residential treatment center.
- Community mental health centers (CMHCs) provide either (1) outpatient services, including specialized outpatient services for children, the elderly, individuals who are chronically mentally ill, and residents of its mental health service area who have been discharged from inpatient treatment at a mental health facility; (2) 24-hour emergency care services; (3) day treatment or other partial hospitalization services, or psychosocial rehabilitation services; or (4) screening for patients being considered for admission to state mental health facilities to determine the appropriateness of the admission. To be classified as a CMHC, a facility must meet applicable licensing or certification requirements for CMHCs in the state in which it is located.
- Other types of residential treatment facilities refers to facilities not licensed as psychiatric hospitals. The primary purpose of other types of residential treatment facilities is to provide individually planned programs of mental health treatment services in a residential care setting; such facilities are not specifically for children or adults only.
- Other refers to another type of hospital or mental health facility not defined in the categories above.
Exclusions
The survey universe for the 2019 N-MHSS excluded: (1) Department of Defense (DoD) military treatment facilities, (2) individual private practitioners or small group practices not licensed as a mental health clinic or center, and (3) jails or prisons.
Facilities are not eligible for inclusion in the survey universe if they only provide one or more of the following services: crisis intervention services, psychosocial rehabilitation, cognitive rehabilitation, intake, referral, mental health evaluation, health promotion, psychoeducational services, transportation services, respite services, consumer-run/peer support services, housing services, or legal advocacy. Residential facilities whose primary function is not to provide specialty mental health treatment services are also not eligible for inclusion in the survey universe for the N-MHSS.
Content
The 2019 N-MHSS instrument, which appears in its print format as Appendix A, is an eight-page document with 32 numbered questions. Topics included:
- facility type, operation, and primary treatment focus;
- facility treatment characteristics (e.g., settings of care; mental health treatment approaches, supportive services and practices, and dedicated or exclusively designed programs or groups offered; and crisis intervention team availability);
- facility operating characteristics (e.g., age groups accepted; availability of treatment services provided in non-English languages and in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing; and smoking policy); and facility management characteristics (e.g., licensure, certification, and accreditation; sources of payment and funding).
A two-page addendum to the 2019 N-MHSS instrument, also presented in Appendix A, included questions for Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities about standardized processes or workflows for appropriate referrals; suicide prevention services offered; follow-up of mental health clients with suicidal thoughts and behavior; the timing of staff training in suicide prevention strategies, suicide risk screening programs implemented; identification of warning signs for suicide and violence; universal client suicide risk assessment; and the number of full-time suicide prevention coordinators (SPCs), care managers for high suicide risk clients, and program support assistants for high risk clients employed. Data from the VA addendum is presented in Chapter 5.
Data collection
There were three data collection modes employed: a secure web-based questionnaire, a paper questionnaire sent by mail, and a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI). Approximately four weeks before the survey reference date (April 30, 2019), SAMHSA mailed letters to the attention of the facility directors of all eligible facilities to alert them to expect the survey and to request their participation in the N-MHSS (Appendix B). The letter also served to update records with new address information received from the U.S. Postal Service. A data collection packet (including SAMHSA cover letter, state-specific letter of support, information on completing the survey on the web, and fact sheet of frequently asked questions) was mailed to each facility on April 30, 2019. The web-based survey also became available at the same time. At this point, each facility had the option of completing the questionnaire via the secure survey website or asking for a paper questionnaire to complete and return via postal mail. In August 2019, another, similar packet was sent to non-responding facilities, this time including a copy of the questionnaire, a definitions packet, and a postage-paid return envelope.
During the data collection phase, contract personnel were available by telephone to answer facilities’ questions concerning the survey. Facilities completing the questionnaire on the Internet had access to hyperlinks to an information site containing definitions of the survey elements. Multiple reminder letters were sent to non-respondents over the course of the data collection period via fax, mail, and e-mail. To increase the survey response rate, state mental health agency representatives were contacted during the data collection period to inform them of their state’s progress and to request additional help in encouraging responses. Blaise®-to-web follow-up (assisted telephone interviews) of non-respondents began in August 2019 and ended in late November 2019.
Eligibility and unit response rate
Table 1.1 presents a summary of eligibility and response rate information. Of the 14,936 mental health treatment facilities in the survey, 6 percent were found to be ineligible for the survey, because they did not provide mental health treatment services, had a primary treatment focus of substance abuse services or general health care, provided treatment for incarcerated persons only (i.e., in jails or prisons), were an individual or small group mental health practice not licensed or certified as a mental health center or clinic, or were closed.
Table 1.1. N-MHSS facilities, by status and mode of response: 2019
|
Number |
Percent |
Total facilities in universe |
14,936 |
100.0 |
Closed/ineligible |
923 |
6.2 |
Eligible |
14,013 |
93.8 |
|
Total eligible |
14,013 |
100.0 |
Non-respondents |
1,301 |
9.3 |
Respondents |
12,712 |
90.7 |
Excluded from report (administrative only) |
240 |
1.7 |
Eligible for report |
12,472 |
89.0 |
|
Mode of response |
12,472 |
100.0 |
Internet |
11,678 |
93.6 |
Mail |
145 |
1.2 |
Telephone |
649 |
5.2 |
|
Facility Reporting and Selection for the 2019 N-MHSS Report
Of the 14,013 facilities eligible for the survey, 91 percent completed the survey, including 240 facilities that did not provide direct mental health treatment services [Table 1.1]. (These 240 facilities, which provided administrative services only, were excluded from the report but have been included in SAMHSA’s online Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator.) After excluding the 240 facilities that provided only administrative services, data from 12,472 eligible respondent facilities were included in the 2019 N-MHSS report. Of the respondents that were eligible for the report, 94 percent completed the survey on the web, 1 percent through the mail, and 5 percent on the telephone.
Quality Assurance
All completed mail questionnaires underwent a manual review for consistency and missing data. Calls to facilities clarified questionable responses and obtained missing data. After data entry, automated quality assurance reviews were conducted. The reviews incorporated the rules used in manual editing plus consistency checks not readily identified by manual review. The web-based questionnaire was programmed to be self-editing; that is, respondents were prompted to complete missing responses and to confirm or correct inconsistent responses on critical items. The CATI questionnaire was similarly programmed.
Response Rates
The final unit response rate among facilities eligible for the survey was 91 percent. Extensive follow-up during data collection and careful editing maximized item response; the item response rates averaged more than 99 percent across all 149 separate items (see Appendix C).
Data Considerations and Limitations
As with any data collection effort, certain procedural considerations and data limitations must be taken into account when interpreting data from the 2019 N-MHSS. Some general issues are listed below. Considerations and limitations of specific data items are discussed where the data are presented.
- The N-MHSS is a voluntary survey, and while every effort is made to obtain responses from all known mental health treatment facilities within the scope of the survey, some facilities did not respond. There was no adjustment for the 9 percent facility non-response.
- Multiple responses were allowed for certain questionnaire items (e.g., services provided in non-English languages and type of payment or insurance accepted for mental health treatment services). Tabulations of data for these items include the total number of facilities reporting each response category.
Organization of the Report
The balance of this report is organized into the following chapters:
- Chapter 2 presents trends in facility characteristics between 2015 and 2019.
- Chapter 3 describes key characteristics of facilities and the programs and services they provided in 2019.
- Chapter 4 presents Census region- and state-level detail for some of the tables presented in Chapter 3.
- Chapter 5 presents selected characteristics of Veterans Affairs facilities.
- Appendix A contains the 2019 N-MHSS mail survey questionnaire.
- Appendix B contains details of the data collection procedures.
- Appendix C contains information on item response rates.
- Appendix D contains the list of contributors.
It should be noted that the 2019 N-MHSS findings as discussed in Chapters 2–5 of this report, as well as all figures, have been rounded to whole numbers to assist the reader. Please note that percentage distributions in Chapter 2–5 tables and figures may not add to 100 percent due to rounding.
Chapter 2. Trends in Facility Characteristics
Number of Facilities
Facility Operation
This chapter presents trends in facility characteristics between 2015 and 2019.
Number of Facilities
Table 2.1. The total number of mental health treatment facilities remained stable between 2015 and 2019. There was considerable turnover from year to year in the individual facilities responding to the survey: Between 86 and 92 percent of the facilities responding to a survey had also responded to the previous year’s survey. Between 9 and 16 percent of the facilities from year-to-year closed, were no longer providing mental health treatment services, or did not respond to the current year’s survey. However, those facilities were replaced by similar facilities that had not responded in the previous year.
There was a net increase of 790 eligible responding facilities between 2018 and 2019, from 11,682 to 12,472 facilities. Of the facilities that responded to the 2019 survey, 86 percent had also responded to the 2018 survey, and 14 percent were new to the 2019 survey or did not respond in 2018. Of the facilities that responded in 2018, 9 percent had closed, were no longer providing mental health treatment, or did not respond in 2019.
Facility Operation
Table 2.2. The operational structure of the mental health treatment system (i.e., the types of entities responsible for operating facilities) had some notable changes between 2015 and 2019.
- Private non-profit organizations operated 63 percent of all facilities in 2015 and 61 percent of facilities in 2019.
- Private for-profit organizations operated 18 percent of all facilities in 2015 and 20 percent of facilities in 2019.
- State mental health authorities (SMHAs) operated 22 percent of facilities in 2015 and 17 percent of facilities in 2019.
- Regional/district authorities or county, local, or municipal governments operated 37 percent of facilities in 2015 and 39 percent of facilities in 2019.
- Tribal governments operated less than 1 percent of facilities each year between 2015 and 2019.
- The Department of Veterans Affairs operated 19 percent of facilities in 2015 and 23 percent of facilities in 2019.
Chapter 3. Facility Characteristics and Services
Facility Type and Facility Operation
Service Settings Offered
Treatment Approaches
Services and Practices
Age Groups
Dedicated or Exclusively Designed Treatment Programs or Groups for Specific Client Types
Treatment Services Provided in Languages Other Than English and for the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing
Crisis Intervention Teams
Types of Payment or Insurance Accepted
Smoking Policy
Facility Licensing, Certification, or Accreditation
This chapter describes key features of mental health treatment facilities included in the 2019 N-MHSS. See Chapter 1 for definitions of the types of mental health treatment facilities included in the N-MHSS.
Facility Type and Facility Operation
Table 3.1 and Figure 1. Facilities were classified according to one of the following facility type categories: psychiatric hospitals, general hospitals, residential treatment centers (RTCs) for children, RTCs for adults, community mental health centers, outpatient mental health facilities (including facilities that provide mental health treatment services in outpatient or partial hospitalization/day treatment settings), other types of residential treatment facilities, multi-setting mental health facilities, Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers, or other.
Figure 1 presents the percent distribution of the 12,472 facilities by type of facility.
Figure 1. Facility type: 2019
Table 3.2 and Figure 2. Facilities were asked about the type of entity responsible for their operation. Of all 12,472 facilities, 61 percent were operated by private non-profit organizations. Next were private for-profit organizations (20 percent) and regional/district authorities or county, local, or municipal governments (7 percent).
Figure 2. Facility operation: 2019
Service Settings Offered
Table 3.1 and Figure 3. The four service settings (levels of care) in which facilities offered mental health treatment services were 24-hour hospital inpatient settings (inpatient), 24-hour residential settings (residential), less-than-24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment settings (partial hospitalization/day treatment), and less-than-24-hour outpatient settings (outpatient). A facility could offer care in more than one service setting.
Figure 3. Of all 12,472 mental health treatment facilities, 78 percent offered less-than-24-hour mental health treatment services in outpatient settings, 16 percent offered 24-hour residential settings, 15 percent offered 24-hour inpatient settings, and 15 percent offered less-than-24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment settings.
Among outpatient mental health facilities, more than 99 percent offered less-than-24-hour outpatient mental health treatment service settings, 5 percent offered less-than-24-hour partial hospitalization/ day treatment service settings, and less than 1 percent offered either 24-hour residential or 24-hour hospital inpatient service settings.
- Among psychiatric hospitals, 99 percent offered 24-hour hospital inpatient service settings. Greater proportions of private psychiatric hospitals (49 percent) than public psychiatric hospitals (7 percent) offered less-than-24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment service settings. Greater proportions of private psychiatric hospitals (47 percent) than public psychiatric hospitals (19 percent) also offered less-than-24-hour outpatient mental health treatment service settings.
- Among multi-setting facilities, 93 percent offered less-than-24-hour outpatient mental health treatment service settings, 56 percent offered less-than-24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment, 51 percent offered 24-hour residential service settings, and 5 percent offered 24-hour hospital inpatient service settings.
- All VA medical centers offered less-than-24-hour outpatient mental health treatment service settings, while 21 percent offered 24-hour hospital inpatient service settings.
- Among community mental health centers, 99 percent offered less-than-24-hour outpatient mental health treatment service settings, 12 percent offered less-than-24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment, 1 percent offered 24-hour hospital inpatient service settings, and 1 percent offered 24-hour residential service settings.
Figure 3. Service settings: 2019
Treatment Approaches
Tables 3.3a–b. Facilities indicated whether or not they offered specific types of mental health treatment approaches.
- Among eligible responding facilities, the most commonly offered treatment approaches were individual psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, group therapy, and psychotropic medication therapy.
- Individual psychotherapy was offered by at least three fifths of each facility type, ranging from 65 percent of residential treatment centers for adults to 96 percent of community mental health centers. Cognitive behavioral therapy was also offered by more than three fifths of each facility type, ranging from 63 percent of residential treatment centers for adults to 96 percent of multi-setting mental health facilities. Group therapy was offered by 98 percent of private psychiatric hospitals and 69 percent of residential treatment centers for adults.
- Over 98 percent of psychiatric hospitals and general hospitals provided psychotropic medication therapy. By comparison, psychotropic medication therapy was provided by a smaller proportion of partial hospitalization/day treatment facilities (76 percent) and outpatient mental health facilities (72 percent).
- The least common mental health treatment approach provided by facilities was electroconvulsive therapy, offered at 4 percent of all facilities. Electroconvulsive therapy was most commonly offered in general hospitals with a separate psychiatric unit (31 percent) and private psychiatric hospitals (16 percent).
Services and Practices
Tables 3.4a–b. Facilities were asked if they provided specific supportive services and practices. A facility could provide supportive services and practices for more than one type of service or practice.
- The most common types of supportive services/practices were family psychoeducation
(68 percent) and case management (67 percent).
- The percentage of mental health treatment facilities that offered case management ranged from 54 percent of public psychiatric hospital facilities and 55 percent of partial hospitalization/day treatment facilities to 88 percent of other types of residential treatment facilities.
- Among VA medical centers, 93 percent offered suicide prevention services.
- The percentage of mental health treatment facilities that offered family psychoeducation ranged from 38 percent of RTCs for adults to 84 percent of other types of residential treatment facilities.
- The least common type of supportive services/practices offered was therapeutic foster care (5 percent). RTCs for children (12 percent), other types of residential treatment facilities
(22 percent), and multi-setting mental health facilities (13 percent) had the largest proportions of facilities that offered therapeutic foster care.
Age Groups
Table 3.5 and Figure 4. Facilities were asked if they accepted the following age groups for treatment: children (aged 12 years or younger), adolescents (aged 13 to 17 years), young adults
(aged 18 to 25 years), adults (aged 26 to 64 years), and seniors (aged 65 years or older). Facilities could accept more than one age group for treatment.
- Figure 4 presents the proportions of facilities that accepted various age groups for treatment.
- The most common age categories of clients accepted were young adults (88 percent), adults (84 percent), and seniors (80 percent).
- Fewer than half (44 percent) of all facilities accepted persons of all ages for treatment.
Figure 4. Age groups accepted for treatment: 2019
Dedicated or Exclusively Designed Treatment Programs or Groups for Specific Client Types
Tables 3.6a–b and Figure 5. Facilities were asked if they offered dedicated or exclusively designed programs or groups for specific client types.
- Among all types of mental health treatment facilities, close to half offered dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs or groups for persons 18 years and older with serious mental illness (49 percent).
- About 46 percent of outpatient mental health facilities provided dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs or groups for persons who have experienced trauma (excluding persons with a PTSD diagnosis) and 46 percent of outpatient mental health facilities provided dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs or groups for persons with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders.
- With the exception of RTCs for children, at least 40 percent of all facility types offered dedicated or exclusively designed programs or groups for persons 18 years and older with serious mental illness.
- Dedicated or exclusively designed programs or groups for persons with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders were most commonly offered by private psychiatric hospitals (70 percent), public psychiatric hospitals (61 percent), and multi-setting mental health facilities (60 percent).
- Facility types serving a specific population had the highest proportion of facilities that offered programs exclusively designed for such populations. For example, 81 percent of RTCs for children operated programs designed for children/adolescents with serious emotional disturbance, compared with other facility types, among which this specific program was present between 0 and 65 percent of the time.
- VA medical centers had the highest proportion of facilities that offered exclusively designed programs or groups for veterans (97 percent) and for persons who have a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (73 percent).
Figure 5. Facilities that offered programs for persons with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders, by facility type: 2019
Treatment Services Provided in Languages Other Than English and for the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing
Table 3.7. Facilities were asked if treatment services were provided in a language other than English, if staff provided the services in other languages, and in what other languages staff provided services. Facilities were also asked if they offered treatment services for the deaf and hard-of-hearing.
- Among all facilities, 73 percent provided treatment services in languages other than English. In 34 percent of all facilities, staff provided treatment services in Spanish.
- Greater proportions of psychiatric hospitals (90 percent), general hospitals (88 percent), and community mental health centers (84 percent) provided treatment services in languages other than English. The facility type with the lowest proportion of treatment services provided in languages other than English was RTCs for children (44 percent).
- The proportions of facilities with staff that provided treatment services in Spanish ranged from 15 percent among partial hospitalization/day treatment facilities to 46 percent among public psychiatric hospitals.
- Less than 1 percent of all facilities provided services in an American Indian or Alaska Native language.
- More than half of all facilities (57 percent) offered treatment services for the deaf and hard-of- hearing. Over four fifths of general hospitals and psychiatric hospitals offered treatment services for the deaf and hard-of-hearing (85 and 86 percent, respectively).
Crisis Intervention Teams
Table 3.8. Facilities were asked whether or not they employ a crisis intervention team.
- Almost half of facilities indicated that they employ a crisis intervention team within the facility and/or offsite to handle acute mental health issues (48 percent).
- The proportions of facilities that had a crisis intervention team within the facility and/or offsite ranged from 34 percent of partial hospitalization/day treatment facilities to 72 percent of community mental health centers.
- A greater proportion of private psychiatric hospitals (60 percent) than public psychiatric hospitals (38 percent) employed a crisis intervention team within the facility and/or offsite.
Types of Payment or Insurance Accepted
Tables 3.9a–b and Figure 6. Facilities were asked to indicate the types of client payments, insurance, or funding that were accepted for the treatment services they provided.
- Large proportions of community mental health centers accepted Medicaid (99 percent), cash or self-payment (93 percent), and private health insurance (89 percent).
- Greater proportions of RTCs for adults than of RTCs for children accepted cash or self-payment (75 vs. 61 percent) and Medicare (47 vs. 10 percent), while greater proportions of RTCs for children than of RTCs for adults accepted private health insurance (67 vs. 49 percent) and state- financed health insurance (45 vs. 40 percent).
- A greater proportion of private psychiatric hospitals than of public psychiatric hospitals accepted cash or self-payment (94 vs. 85 percent), federal military insurance (79 vs. 49 percent), and state-financed health insurance plans (64 vs. 56 percent).
Medicaid was accepted by at least 75 percent of all facility types except VA medical centers (21 percent).
Figure 6. Types of payment or insurance accepted, by facility type: 2019
Smoking Policy
Table 3.10. Facilities were asked about their smoking policy.
- More than half of all mental health treatment facilities (51 percent) reported that smoking was not permitted anywhere outside or within any building, and 42 percent reported that smoking was permitted in designated outdoor areas.
- Compared with all other types of facilities, RTCs for children, general hospitals, and public psychiatric hospitals most commonly prohibited smoking altogether (94, 93, and 93 percent, respectively).
- More than three quarters of RTCs for adults (78 percent) permitted smoking only in designated outdoor areas. More than half of VA medical centers (54 percent), multi-setting mental health facilities (56 percent), and community mental health centers (49 percent) permitted smoking only in designated outdoor areas. Almost half of partial hospitalization/day treatment facilities (48 percent) permitted smoking only in designated outdoor areas.
Facility Licensing, Certification, or Accreditation
Tables 3.11a–b. Facilities were asked if they have any licensing, certification, or accreditation. A facility could be licensed, certified, or accredited by one or more agencies or organizations.
- Of all mental health treatment facilities, 71 percent were licensed, certified, or accredited by state mental health authorities, 51 percent by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), 49 percent by state departments of health, and 34 percent by the Joint Commission.
- More than 80 percent of VA medical centers and psychiatric hospitals were accredited by the Joint Commission.
Chapter 4. Selected Facility Characteristics at the Regional and State Levels
Survey Response
Facility Type
Facility Operation
Service Settings Offered
Treatment Approaches
Services and Practices
Age Groups
Dedicated or Exclusively Designed Treatment Programs or Groups for Specific Client Types
Treatment Services Provided in Languages Other Than English and for the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing
Crisis Intervention Teams
Types of Payment or Insurance Accepted
Facility Licensing, Certification, or Accreditation
This chapter presents the data for the U.S. Census regions, states, and jurisdictions that were discussed at the national level in Chapters 2 and 3. Throughout this chapter, states/jurisdictions are defined as the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the combined jurisdictions of American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Note that facilities operated by federal agencies (i.e., Department of Veterans Affairs, and Indian Health Service) are included in the states in which the facilities are located, although these facilities may provide services to clients from other states.
Of the 12,472 mental health treatment facilities that responded to, and were included in, the 2019 N-MHSS, California and New York had the largest total numbers of facilities (952 and 860 facilities, respectively). There were three other states that had more than 500 facilities each: Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania [Tables 4.2a–b]. These five states combined accounted for 28 percent of all mental health treatment facilities that responded to the survey in 2019.
Figure 7 presents the U.S. Census regions for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Throughout this chapter and in the Chapter 4 tables, data for all U.S. territories included in the 2019 N-MHSS, except Puerto Rico, have been aggregated and are discussed as a single category, other jurisdictions.
Figure 7. U.S. Census regions and divisions
Survey Response
Table 4.1. Among the 12,712 facilities that responded the survey, Kentucky had the highest response rate (97 percent), and North Carolina has the lowest response rate (82 percent).
Facility Type
Tables 4.2a–b and Figure 8. Of the 12,472 mental health treatment facilities, outpatient mental health facilities and community mental health centers accounted for the greatest proportions of facilities (42 and 22 percent, respectively).
- In three states, fewer than 10 percent of all mental health treatment facilities were outpatient mental health facilities: South Carolina, Alabama, and New Hampshire.
- In three states, 70 percent or more of all mental health treatment facilities were outpatient mental health facilities: Wisconsin, Delaware, and Idaho.
- There were three states that each had 10 or more public psychiatric hospitals: New York, California, and Texas.
- There were four states that each had more than 30 private psychiatric hospitals: Texas, California, Louisiana, and Florida.
- There were four states that each had more than 50 general hospitals with separate psychiatric units: New York, Pennsylvania, California, and Illinois.
- Three states each had 30 or more RTCs for children: California, North Carolina, and Texas.
- Six states each had 40 or more RTCs for adults: California, Arizona, Oregon, Illinois, Florida, and New York.
- Three states each had at least 40 partial hospitalization/day treatment facilities: New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.
- There were three states that each had 25 or more multi-setting mental health treatment facilities: Pennsylvania, Ohio, and California.
Figure 8. States in which 40 percent or more of all mental health treatment facilities were outpatient mental health facilities: 2019
Facility Operation
Tables 4.3a–b and Figure 9 present data on facility operation.
- There were 10 states in which 80 percent or more of all mental health treatment facilities were operated by private non-profit organizations (Rhode Island, West Virginia, Colorado, Montana, South Dakota, New Hampshire, Iowa, Connecticut, Kentucky, and Indiana).
- Private non-profit organizations operated 61 percent of all mental health treatment facilities. The Census region with the largest proportion of mental health treatment facilities operated by private non-profit organizations was the Northeast (74 percent), followed by the Midwest (68 percent), West (57 percent), and South (50 percent).
- The proportion of facilities operated by private non-profit organizations was highest in Rhode Island (90 percent), followed by West Virginia (89 percent). The proportion of facilities operated by private non-profit organizations was lowest in South Carolina (9 percent) and Idaho (9 percent).
- There were seven states that each had more than 300 facilities operated by private non-profit organizations: New York, California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Illinois, and Washington.
- By contrast, there were seven states/jurisdictions (other jurisdictions, Hawaii, South Carolina, Idaho, Nevada, North Dakota, and Delaware) in which 20 or fewer facilities were operated by private non-profit organizations.
- Private for-profit organizations operated 20 percent of all mental health treatment facilities. The Census region with the largest proportion of mental health treatment facilities operated by private for-profit organizations was the South (27 percent), followed by the West, Midwest, and Northeast (24 percent, 16 percent, and 11 percent, respectively).
- The states/jurisdictions with the highest proportions of facilities operated by private for-profit organizations were Idaho (71 percent), Utah (55 percent), North Carolina (54 percent), Puerto Rico (53 percent), Louisiana (44 percent), and Wisconsin (38 percent).
- There were seven states in which private for-profit organizations operated 100 or more facilities (California, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Arizona, Florida, Utah, and Pennsylvania), and these seven states combined accounted for 41 percent of all mental health treatment facilities operated by private for-profit organizations.
- Overall, regional/district authorities or county, local, or municipal governments operated
7 percent of all mental health treatment facilities. Regional/district authorities or county, local, or municipal governments operated 10 percent of facilities in the West, 8 percent of facilities in the South, 7 percent of facilities in the Midwest, and 3 percent of facilities in the Northeast.
- Regional/district authorities or county, local, or municipal governments operated more than
20 percent of facilities in Virginia, Kansas, and California.
- State mental health authorities (SMHAs) operated 3 percent of all mental health treatment facilities. The proportion was highest in the South (5 percent), followed by the Northeast
(4 percent), Midwest (2 percent), and West (1 percent).
- The state in which SMHAs operated the highest proportion of facilities was South Carolina (55 percent). SMHAs operated more than 10 percent of facilities in three additional states/ jurisdictions: other jurisdictions, Nevada, and Oklahoma.
- There were two states that each had 50 or more SMHA-operated mental health treatment facilities: New York and South Carolina.
Figure 9. States in which 80 percent or more of all mental health treatment facilities were operated by private non-profit organizations: 2019
Service Settings Offered
Tables 4.4a–4.7b present the service settings offered by type of facility, region, and state/jurisdiction. Overall findings by service setting include:
- Of the 1,892 facilities that provided treatment services in 24-hour inpatient settings, general hospitals with separate psychiatric units and psychiatric hospitals, combined, accounted for
91 percent. General hospitals accounted for 54 percent of facilities that provided treatment services in 24-hour inpatient settings; psychiatric hospitals accounted for 37 percent [Table 4.4b].
- By Census region, the proportion of general hospitals that provided treatment services in 24-hour inpatient settings ranged from 40 percent in the West to 68 percent in the Northeast [Table 4.4b].
- In 10 states/jurisdictions, less than 40 percent of facilities provided 24-hour inpatient treatment services through a general hospital (Nevada, Delaware, Arizona, Puerto Rico, Texas, Washington, Alaska, South Dakota, Florida, and Indiana) [Table 4.4b].
- Mental health treatment services in a 24-hour residential setting were provided by 1,979 facilities, of which a combined 83 percent were RTCs for adults (43 percent), RTCs for children
(30 percent), and multi-setting facilities (10 percent) [Table 4.5b].
- The proportion of RTCs for children that provided treatment services in 24-hour residential settings ranged from 27 percent each in the West and the Northeast to 37 percent in the South [Table 4.5b].
- Less than 24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment was provided by 1,901 facilities, of which a combined 77 percent were partial hospitalization/day treatment facilities (21 percent), community mental health centers (17 percent), outpatient mental health facilities (15 percent), general hospitals (13 percent), and multi-setting facilities (11 percent) [Table 4.6b].
- The proportion of partial hospitalization/day treatment facilities that provided treatment services in less-than-24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment settings ranged from 14 percent in the South to 35 percent in the Northeast [Table 4.6b].
- The proportion of community mental health centers that provided treatment services in less- than-24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment settings ranged from 9 percent in the West and Northeast to 26 percent in the South [Table 4.6b].
- Most of the 9,766 facilities that provided mental health treatment services in less-than-24-hour outpatient settings were outpatient mental health facilities (53 percent); less than 1 percent each were public psychiatric hospitals, RTCs for children, RTCs for adults, and other types of residential treatment facilities [Table 4.7b].
- The proportion of outpatient mental health facilities that provided treatment services in less- than-24-hour outpatient treatment settings ranged from 44 percent in the South to 66 percent in the Northeast [Table 4.7b].
- The proportion of outpatient mental health facilities that provided less-than-24-hour outpatient treatment ranged from 6 percent in South Carolina to 84 percent each in Wisconsin and Delaware [Table 4.7b].
Treatment Approaches
Tables 4.8a–b present data on treatment approaches offered by mental health treatment facilities by region and state/jurisdiction.
- Individual psychotherapy was offered by 92 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 90 percent of facilities in the South and Northeast to 93 percent of facilities in the West.
- Couples/family therapy was offered by 73 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 70 percent of facilities in the South to 76 percent in the Midwest.
- Group therapy was offered by 86 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, with facilities ranging from 84 percent in the Midwest to 88 percent in the West.
- Cognitive behavioral therapy was offered by 90 percent of all facilities, ranging from 88 percent of facilities in the Northeast to 92 percent of facilities in each the Midwest and the West.
- Dialectical behavioral therapy was offered by more than 80 percent of the mental health treatment facilities in three states (Wyoming, North Dakota, and Colorado).
- Behavior modification therapy was offered by more than 80 percent of the mental health treatment facilities in seven states (South Dakota, Arkansas, Delaware, Mississippi, Montana, Puerto Rico, and North Dakota).
- Integrated dual disorders treatment was offered by 70 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in nine states/jurisdictions (Wyoming, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Alaska, Oklahoma, Kentucky, West Virginia, Michigan, and Montana).
- Trauma therapy was offered by 85 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in 13 states (Wyoming, Delaware, South Dakota, Alaska, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Oklahoma, Idaho, Colorado, Utah, Montana, Kentucky, and New Mexico).
- Activity therapy was offered by at least 55 percent of the mental health treatment facilities in six states/jurisdictions (Puerto Rico, Vermont, Oregon, Alaska, New Hampshire, and Mississippi).
- Electroconvulsive therapy was offered by 7 percent or more of mental health treatment facilities in seven states (North Dakota, Rhode Island, Missouri, New Hampshire, Florida, South Carolina, and Texas).
- Telemedicine/telehealth therapy was offered by 55 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in 11 states (North Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Texas, Alaska, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Georgia, West Virginia, South Carolina, and Kansas).
- Psychotropic medication was offered by 90 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in 12 states (South Carolina, New York, Louisiana, North Dakota, Alabama, Rhode Island, Georgia, Arkansas, Hawaii, Texas, Connecticut, and New Hampshire).
Services and Practices
Tables 4.9a–b present data on the services and practice approaches offered by mental health treatment facilities. Figure 10 displays the proportion of mental health treatment facilities that offered psychiatric emergency walk-in services, by region.
- Assertive community treatment was offered by 14 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 10 percent of facilities in the Northeast to 16 percent in the West.
- Intensive case management was offered by 24 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 14 percent of facilities in the Northeast to 33 percent in the West.
- Case management was offered by 67 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 52 percent of facilities in the Northeast to 80 percent in the West.
- Court-ordered outpatient treatment was offered by 48 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 42 percent of facilities in the Northeast to 53 percent in the Midwest.
- Chronic disease/illness management was offered by at least 30 percent of the mental health treatment facilities in six states/jurisdictions (Rhode Island, other jurisdictions, Hawaii, Arizona, Missouri, and North Dakota).
- Illness management and recovery were offered by 45 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in four states (New Hampshire, New Jersey, Texas, and Minnesota).
- Integrated primary care services were offered by more than 40 percent of the mental health treatment facilities in six states/jurisdictions (Oklahoma, Hawaii, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, and Arizona).
- Diet and exercise counseling was offered by 50 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in four states (New Hampshire, Hawaii, Oklahoma, and Rhode Island).
- Family psychoeducation was offered by 68 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 63 percent of facilities in the Midwest to 72 percent in the Northeast.
- Education services were offered by 31 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 29 percent of facilities in the Northeast to 33 percent of facilities in the South.
- Housing services were offered by 21 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 18 percent of facilities in the Northeast to 26 percent in the West.
- Supported housing was offered by 16 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 12 percent of facilities in the Northeast to 19 percent in the West.
- Psychosocial rehabilitation services were offered by at least 60 percent of mental health treatment facilities in six states (Alaska, California, Wyoming, Oklahoma, Idaho, and South Carolina).
- Vocational rehabilitation services were offered by 25 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in eight states (Vermont, Rhode Island, Colorado, Wyoming, Hawaii, Arizona, North Dakota, and New York).
- Supported employment was offered by 35 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in seven states (New Hampshire, Wyoming, Vermont, Oregon, Texas, Kentucky, and Rhode Island).
- Therapeutic foster care was offered by 10 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in five states (Alaska, Montana, South Dakota, Nevada, and Arkansas).
- Legal advocacy was offered by 6 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 5 percent of facilities in the South to 7 percent in the Northeast.
- Psychiatric emergency walk-in services were offered by 31 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 26 percent of facilities in each the West and Northeast to 40 percent in the South.
- Suicide prevention services were offered by 62 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 58 percent of facilities in the Northeast to 65 percent in the South.
- Consumer-run (peer support) services were 40 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in nine states (Idaho, Oregon, Wyoming, Hawaii, Colorado, Georgia, Vermont, Rhode Island, and South Carolina).
- Screening for tobacco use was offered by at least 65 percent of the mental health treatment facilities in 10 states (Indiana, Oklahoma, New York, Missouri, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, North Dakota, Texas, Alaska, and Nebraska).
- Smoking/tobacco cessation counseling was offered by 60 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in six states (Oklahoma, New York, Indiana, Hawaii, New Hampshire, and Texas).
- Nicotine replacement therapy was offered by 40 percent or more of the mental health treatment facilities in seven states (New Hampshire, New York, Oklahoma, Vermont, Louisiana, Indiana, and Missouri).
- Non-nicotine smoking/tobacco cessation medications were offered by 26 percent of all mental health treatment facilities, ranging from 21 percent of facilities in the West to 34 percent in the Northeast.
Figure 10. Mental health treatment facilities that offered psychiatric emergency walk-in services, by region: 2019
Age Groups
Table 4.10 and Figure 11 present data on facilities that accepted children (aged 12 years and younger), adolescents (aged 13 to 17 years), young adults (aged 18 to 25 years), adults (aged 26 to 64 years), and seniors (aged 65 years and older) for treatment.
- Regardless of region, higher proportions of facilities accepted young adults or adults than children or adolescents. The proportion of facilities that accepted young adults ranged from 86 percent in the South to 91 percent in the Midwest; the proportion that accepted adults ranged from 79 percent in the West to 88 percent in the Midwest. The proportion of facilities that accepted children ranged from 54 percent in the Northeast to 66 percent in the Midwest, and the proportion of facilities that accepted adolescents ranged from 60 percent in the Northeast to 71 percent in the Midwest.
- Overall, 44 percent of mental health treatment facilities accepted clients of all ages. The proportion of facilities that accepted all ages was highest in the Midwest (54 percent), followed by the South (47 percent), Northeast (38 percent), and West (37 percent).
- In seven states/jurisdictions, more than 60 percent of mental health treatment facilities accepted clients of all ages (Idaho, Wyoming, South Dakota, other jurisdictions, Wisconsin, West Virginia, and Iowa). In five states, 29 percent or fewer mental health treatment facilities accepted clients of all ages (Rhode Island, California, Hawaii, Vermont, and Connecticut).
Figure 11. Mental health treatment facilities that accepted clients of all ages for treatment, by region: 2019
Dedicated or Exclusively Designed Treatment Programs or Groups for Specific Client Types
Tables 4.11a–b and Figure 12 present data on facilities that offered dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs or groups for specific client types.
- Overall, the dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs or groups most commonly offered by mental health treatment facilities were for persons with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders (50 percent), persons 18 years and older with serious mental illness (49 percent), persons who have experienced trauma (excluding persons with a PTSD diagnosis) (45 percent), and persons with post-traumatic stress disorder (42 percent).
- In all regions, more mental health treatment facilities offered dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs for persons 18 years and older with serious mental illness (ranging from 44 percent in the Midwest to 53 percent in the South) than for children/adolescents with serious emotional disturbance (ranging from 32 percent of facilities in the Northeast to 39 percent of facilities in the South).
- In seven states, 60 percent or more of mental health treatment facilities offered dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs for persons 18 years and older with serious mental illness (South Carolina, Hawaii, other jurisdictions, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Alabama, and Montana). The state with the highest proportion of facilities that offered dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs for children with serious emotional disturbance was Nevada (68 percent), while half or more of facilities in nine other states (Alaska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Kentucky, Kansas, South Carolina, Idaho, New Hampshire, and Arkansas) offered these programs.
- The region with the highest proportion of facilities that offered dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs to persons with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders was the South (56 percent), followed by the West (51 percent), Midwest (47 percent), and Northeast (46 percent).
Figure 12. Mental health treatment facilities that offered dedicated or exclusively designed treatment programs or groups for persons with post-traumatic stress disorder, by region: 2019
Treatment Services Provided in Languages Other Than English and for the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing
Table 4.12 presents data on facilities providing treatment services in a language other than English and on facilities that offered treatment services in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing; Figure 13 presents data on facilities that offered treatment services in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing.
- Overall, the proportion of mental health treatment facilities that provided treatment services in languages other than English was 73 percent, ranging from 70 percent in the Midwest and Northeast, each, to 80 percent in the West. The proportions of facilities where staff provided treatment services in Spanish were 51 percent in the West, 39 percent in the Northeast, 27 percent in the South, and 19 percent in the Midwest.
- Puerto Rico led all states/jurisdictions in the proportion of facilities with staff that provided treatment services in Spanish (84 percent), followed by California (74 percent), New Mexico and Texas (62 percent each), Arizona (61 percent), and District of Columbia (59 percent).
- Overall, more than half of all mental health treatment facilities (57 percent) offered treatment services in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing. The proportion of facilities that offered treatment services in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing was highest in the South (62 percent), followed by the Midwest (61 percent), the West (55 percent), and the Northeast (47 percent).
- In 10 states, 70 percent or more of facilities offered treatment services in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing (South Carolina, Alabama, Indiana, Kentucky, Arkansas, Arizona, Missouri, Florida, South Dakota, and Washington). Treatment services in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing were offered by 40 percent or fewer of facilities in nine states/jurisdictions (other jurisdictions, Wyoming, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Montana, Alaska, Idaho, and Connecticut).
Figure 13. Mental health treatment facilities that offered treatment services in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing, by region: 2019
Crisis Intervention Teams
Table 4.13 presents data on whether or not facilities employ a crisis intervention team by region and state/jurisdiction.
- The proportion of facilities that had a crisis intervention team within the facility and/or offsite ranged from 39 percent in the Northeast to 54 percent in the South.
- In all states/jurisdictions, at least 25 percent of facilities indicated that they employ a crisis intervention team to handle acute mental health issues.
Types of Payment or Insurance Accepted
Tables 4.14a–b and Figure 14 present data on the specific types of payment or insurance accepted by facilities.
- Medicare payments were accepted by 68 percent of all mental health treatment facilities; the highest proportion was in the Midwest (75 percent), followed by the Northeast (71 percent), the South (68 percent), and the West (57 percent).
- Cash or self-payment was accepted by 84 percent of all mental health treatment facilities. The Midwest had the highest proportion of facilities that accepted cash or self-payment (91 percent). Cash or self-payment was accepted by 85 percent of facilities in the South, 82 percent of facilities in the Northeast, and 77 percent of facilities in the West.
- Private health insurance was accepted by 80 percent of all mental health treatment facilities. The Midwest had the highest proportion of facilities that accepted private health insurance
(89 percent), followed by the South and the Northeast (81 percent each), and the West (70 percent).
- Overall, Medicaid was accepted by 88 percent of all mental health treatment facilities. Medicaid was accepted by 95 percent or more of mental health treatment facilities in five states (Nebraska, North Dakota, Montana, Ohio, and West Virginia). It was accepted by 80 percent or fewer of facilities in six states/jurisdictions (Utah, Puerto Rico, California, Florida, other jurisdictions, and Nevada).
- Medicare was accepted by 80 percent or more of mental health treatment facilities in eight states (Michigan, South Carolina, Indiana, Hawaii, New Hampshire, Kansas, Alabama, and Missouri). It was accepted by 55 percent or fewer of facilities in four states/jurisdictions (Utah, Washington, Alaska, and New Mexico).
- Private health insurance was accepted by 95 percent or more of mental health treatment facilities in five states (Wyoming, North Dakota, Arkansas, Wisconsin, and Minnesota).
Figure 14. Mental health treatment facilities that accepted Medicare, by region: 2019
Facility Licensing, Certification, or Accreditation
Tables 4.15a–b. Facilities were asked if they have any licensing, certification, or accreditation.
- A facility could be licensed, certified, or accredited by one or more agencies or organizations.
- The percentage of mental health treatment facilities that were licensed, certified, or accredited by state mental health authorities ranged from 66 percent in the South to 78 percent in the Northeast.
- More than 40 percent of mental health treatment facilities were licensed, certified, or accredited by the state department of health in every Census region.
- At least 35 percent of mental health treatment facilities were accredited by the Joint Commission in three of the four Census regions. In the West, 27 percent of mental health treatment facilities were accredited by the Joint Commission.
Chapter 5. Veterans Affairs Facilities
Suicide Prevention-Related Services
VA Facilities With Suicide Prevention-Related Staff
This chapter presents selected characteristics of Veterans Affairs facilities.
Suicide Prevention-Related Services
Table 5.1 presents data on the availability of suicide prevention-related services in VA facilities, methods for assessment of suicide risk, and the timing of staff training in suicide prevention strategies.
- Of all 540 VA facilities, 92 percent offered services to assess each client’s level of risk for suicide to determine appropriate action, 89 percent maintained a list of clients determined to be at high risk for suicide, and 89 percent followed up with mental health care clients who have suicidal thoughts and suicidal behavior, beginning in the immediate period following their inpatient facility visit.
- Of all 540 VA facilities, 1 percent did not offer any of the suicide prevention services listed.
- Almost 92 percent of VA facilities offered free gun locks, and 80 percent of VA facilities offered suicide prevention-related community outreach of workshops.
- In 84 percent of VA facilities, staff begin training on suicide prevention strategies when they begin working. Less than 1 percent of VA facilities did not offer such training to their staff who have contact with clients.
- About 79 percent of VA facilities had universal client suicide risk screening programs, and less than 1 percent of VA facilities did not have any suicide risk screening programs.
VA Facilities With Suicide Prevention-Related Staff
Table 5.2 offers information on how many full-time suicide prevention-related staff VA facilities have.
- Of all 540 VA facilities, 497 enumerated specific categories of prevention-related staff.
- Of the 497 VA facilities that responded to the question regarding staffing totals, more than half (269 facilities) employed between one and three full-time suicide prevention coordinators (SPCs). Less than half of VA facilities employed between one and three care managers for clients with a high risk for suicide.
- There were 47 VA facilities that each employed between four and five full-time SPCs, and 21 VA facilities that each employed between four and five care managers for high suicide-risk clients.
- There were four VA facilities that each employed more than 11 care managers for high suicide-risk clients.
Appendix A. 2019 N-MHSS Questionnaire
Appendix B. Data Collection Procedures
Survey Frame
The survey frame for the 2019 N-MHSS originally consisted of 14,936 known facilities. Most facilities in the 2019 N-MHSS frame were identified from the updated database produced after fielding the 2010 and 2014 N-MHSS; the 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 mental health augmentations; and new facilities that states requested be added to the I-BHS.
Data Collection
Data collection took place between March 26, 2019, and November 30, 2019. During that period, facilities were contacted through mail, e-mail, fax, and telephone to remind them to complete the survey. Of the total 14,936 facilities included in the survey frame, 923 (6 percent) were closed or ineligible. Ineligible facilities included those that did not provide mental health treatment, were a satellite site focused primarily on substance abuse treatment or general health care, provided treatment only for incarcerated persons in jail or prison, or were an individual or small group mental health practice not licensed or certified as a mental health clinic or center.
Appendix C. Response Rates
Table C1. Item response rates, by question number and description: 2019
Question number
| Description
| Response rate (%)
|
A1-1 | Facility offers mental health intake services |
100.0 |
A1-2 | Facility offers mental health diagnostic evaluation |
100.0 |
A1-3 | Facility offers mental health information and/or referral services |
100.0 |
A1-4 | Facility offers mental health treatment services |
100.0 |
A1-5 | Facility offers treatment for co-occurring serious mental illness/serious |
100.0 |
A1-6 | Facility offers substance use treatment services |
100.0 |
A1-7 | Facility offers administrative services for mental health treatment facilities |
100.0 |
A3-1 | Mental health treatment offered 24-hour hospital inpatient services |
100.0 |
A3-2 | Mental health treatment offered 24-hour residential services |
100.0 |
A3-3 | Mental health treatment offered for less-than-24-hour partial hospitalization/day treatment |
100.0 |
A3-4 | Mental health treatment offered for less-than-24-hour outpatient |
100.0 |
A4 | Facility type |
100.0 |
A5 | Facility is a solo or small group practice |
100.0 |
A5a | Facility is licensed or accredited as MH clinic or center |
100.0 |
A6 | Facility is a Federally Qualified Health Center |
99.9 |
A7 | Primary treatment focus for the facility |
100.0 |
A8 | Facility is a jail, prison, or detention center |
100.0 |
A9 | Facility operation/ownership |
100.0 |
A9a | Public agency or department operation/ownership |
100.0 |
A10-1 | Facility offers individual psychotherapy |
100.0 |
A10-2 | Facility provides couples/family therapy |
100.0 |
A10-3 | Facility provides group therapy |
100.0 |
A10-4 | Facility provides cognitive behavioral therapy |
100.0 |
A10-5 | Facility provides dialectical behavior therapy |
100.0 |
A10-6 | Facility provides behavior modification |
100.0 |
A10-7 | Facility provides integrated dual disorders treatment |
100.0 |
A10-8 | Facility provides trauma therapy |
100.0 |
A10-9 | Facility provides activity therapy |
100.0 |
A10-10 | Facility provides electroconvulsive therapy |
100.0 |
A10-11 | Facility provides telemedicine/telehealth therapy |
100.0 |
A10-12 | Facility provides psychotropic medication therapy |
100.0 |
A10-13 | Facility provides other treatment approaches |
100.0 |
A10-14 | Facility provides none of these treatment approaches |
100.0 |
A11-1 | Facility provides assertive community treatment services |
100.0 |
A11-2 | Facility provides intensive case management services |
100.0 |
A11-3 | Facility provides case management services |
100.0 |
A11-4 | Facility provides court-ordered outpatient treatment |
100.0 |
A11-5 | Facility provides chronic disease/illness management |
100.0 |
A11-6 | Facility provides illness management and recovery |
100.0 |
A11-7 | Facility provides integrated primary care services |
100.0 |
A11-8 | Facility provides diet and exercise counseling |
100.0 |
A11-9 | Facility provides family psychoeducation |
100.0 |
A11-10 | Facility provides education services |
100.0 |
A11-11 | Facility provides housing services |
100.0 |
A11-12 | Facility provides supported housing |
100.0 |
A11-13 | Facility provides psychosocial rehabilitation services |
100.0 |
A11-14 | Facility provides vocational rehabilitation services |
100.0 |
A11-15 | Facility provides supported employment services |
100.0 |
A11-16 | Facility provides therapeutic foster care services |
100.0 |
A11-17 | Facility provides legal advocacy services |
100.0 |
A11-18 | Facility provides psychiatric emergency walk-in services |
100.0 |
A11-19 | Facility provides suicide prevention services |
100.0 |
A11-20 | Facility provides consumer-run (peer support) services |
100.0 |
A11-21 | Facility provides screening for tobacco use services |
100.0 |
A11-22 | Facility provides smoking/tobacco cessation counseling services |
100.0 |
A11-23 | Facility provides nicotine replacement therapy |
100.0 |
A11-24 | Facility provides non-nicotine smoking/tobacco cessation medications (by prescription) |
100.0 |
A11-25 | Facility provides other services and practices |
100.0 |
A11-26 | Facility provides none of these services or practices |
100.0 |
A12-1 | Children (12 years or younger) accepted at facility |
100.0 |
A12-2 | Adolescents (13-17 years) accepted at facility |
100.0 |
A12-3 | Young adults (18-25 years) accepted at facility |
100.0 |
A12-4 | Adults (26-64 years) accepted at facility |
100.0 |
A12-5 | Seniors (65 years or older) accepted at facility |
100.0 |
A13-1 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for children/adolescents with serious emotional disturbance (SED) |
100.0 |
A13-2 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for transitional age young adults |
100.0 |
A13-3 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for persons 18 years and older with serious mental illness (SMI) |
100.0 |
A13-4 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for seniors or older adults |
100.0 |
A13-5 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for persons with Alzheimer’s or dementia |
100.0 |
A13-6 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for persons with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders |
100.0 |
A13-7 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for persons with eating disorders |
100.0 |
A13-8 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for persons with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) |
100.0 |
A13-9 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for persons who have experienced trauma (excluding persons with a PTSD diagnosis) |
100.0 |
A13-10 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for persons with TBI |
100.0 |
A13-11 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for veterans |
100.0 |
A13-12 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for active duty military |
100.0 |
A13-13 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for members of military families |
100.0 |
A13-14 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for LGBT clients |
100.0 |
A13-15 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for forensic clients (referred from the court/judicial system) |
100.0 |
A13-16 | Facility offers program/group designed exclusively for persons with HIV or AIDS |
100.0 |
A13-17 | Facility offers another special program or group |
100.0 |
A13-18 | Facility offers no exclusively designed programs or groups |
100.0 |
A14 | Facility offers crisis intervention team |
99.8 |
A15 | Facility offers mental health treatment services in sign language for the deaf and hard-of-hearing |
99.6 |
A16 | Facility provides mental health treatment services in a language other than English |
99.7 |
A16a | Who provides treatment services in languages other than English? |
100.0 |
A16a1 | Staff provides treatment services in Spanish |
100.0 |
A16a2 | Staff provides treatment services in any language besides Spanish |
99.9 |
A16b-1 | Staff provides treatment services in Hopi |
99.9 |
A16b-2 | Staff provides treatment services in Lakota |
99.9 |
A16b-3 | Staff provides treatment services in Navajo |
99.9 |
A16b-4 | Staff provides treatment services in Ojibwa |
99.9 |
A16b-5 | Staff provides treatment services in Yupik |
99.9 |
A16b-6 | Staff provides treatment services in other Native American Indian/Alaska Native language |
100.0 |
A16b-7 | Staff provides treatment services in Arabic |
99.9 |
A16b-8 | Staff provides treatment services in any Chinese language |
99.9 |
A16b-9 | Staff provides treatment services in Creole |
99.9 |
A16b-10 | Staff provides treatment services in Farsi |
99.9 |
A16b-11 | Staff provides treatment services in French |
99.9 |
A16b-12 | Staff provides treatment services in German |
99.9 |
A16b-13 | Staff provides treatment services in Greek |
99.9 |
A16b-14 | Staff provides treatment services in Hebrew |
99.9 |
A16b-15 | Staff provides treatment services in Hindi |
99.9 |
A16b-16 | Staff provides treatment services in Hmong |
99.9 |
A16b-17 | Staff provides treatment services in Italian |
99.9 |
A16b-18 | Staff provides treatment services in Japanese |
99.9 |
A16b-19 | Staff provides treatment services in Korean |
99.9 |
A16b-20 | Staff provides treatment services in Polish |
99.9 |
A16b-21 | Staff provides treatment services in Portuguese |
99.9 |
A16b-22 | Staff provides treatment services in Russian |
99.9 |
A16b-23 | Staff provides treatment services in Tagalog |
99.9 |
A16b-24 | Staff provides treatment services in Vietnamese |
99.9 |
A16b-25 | Staff provides treatment services in any other language |
100.0 |
A17 | Facility's smoking policy |
99.7 |
A18 | Facility uses a sliding fee scale |
95.7 |
A18a | Include sliding fee scale in Locator |
100.0 |
A19 | Facility offers treatment at no charge or minimal payment |
95.6 |
A19a | Include availability of free treatment in Locator |
100.0 |
A20-1 | Facility accepts cash or self-payment |
99.8 |
A20-2 | Facility accepts private health insurance |
99.8 |
A20-3 | Facility accepts Medicare payments |
99.8 |
A20-4 | Facility accepts Medicaid payments |
99.8 |
A20-5 | Facility accepts state-financed health insurance plan other than Medicaid |
99.8 |
A20-6 | Facility accepts state mental health agency (or equivalent) funds |
99.8 |
A20-7 | Facility accepts state welfare or child and family services agency funds |
99.8 |
A20-8 | Facility accepts state corrections or juvenile justice agency funds |
99.8 |
A20-9 | Facility accepts state education agency funds |
99.8 |
A20-10 | Facility accepts other state government funds |
99.8 |
A20-11 | Facility accepts county or local government funds |
99.8 |
A20-12 | Facility accepts Community Service Block Grants |
99.8 |
A20-13 | Facility accepts Community Mental Health Block Grants |
99.8 |
A20-14 | Facility accepts federal military insurance |
99.8 |
A20-15 | Facility accepts U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs funds |
99.8 |
A20-16 | Facility accepts IHS/Tribal/Urban (ITU) funds |
99.8 |
A20-17 | Facility accepts other types of client payments |
100.0 |
A21-1 | Facility has licensing through state mental health authority |
99.8 |
A21-2 | Facility has licensing through state substance abuse agency |
99.8 |
A21-3 | Facility has licensing through state department of health |
99.8 |
A21-4 | Facility has licensing through state or local department of family and children's services |
99.8 |
A21-5 | Facility has licensing through hospital licensing authority |
99.8 |
A21-6 | Facility has accreditation through Joint Commission |
99.8 |
A21-7 | Facility has licensing through Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) |
99.8 |
A21-8 | Facility has licensing through Council on Accreditation (COA) |
99.8 |
A21-9 | Facility has licensing through Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) |
99.8 |
A21-10 | Facility has licensing through other national organization, or federal, state, or local agency |
100.0 |
C1 | Facility wants to be listed in SAMHSA’s online Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator |
99.9 |
C1a-1 | Facility wants its street address to be listed in SAMHSA’s online Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator |
86.7 |
C1a-2 | Facility wants its mailing address to be listed in SAMHSA’s online Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator |
86.7 |
C1a-3 | Facility doesn't want its either its street or mailing address to be listed in SAMHSA’s online Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator |
86.7 |
VA1 | Facility has a standardized process or workflow for referring clients to appropriate care settings |
100.0 |
VA2 |
Facility engages in the follow-up of clients of mental health care with suicidal thoughts and suicidal behavior, beginning in the immediate period following their inpatient facility visits |
100.0 |
VA3-1 | Facility offers lethal means safety training |
100.0 |
VA3-2 | Facility offers free gun locks |
100.0 |
VA3-3 | Facility offers suicide prevention-related community outreach of workshops |
100.0 |
VA3-4 | Facility doesn't offer any of these suicide prevention services |
100.0 |
VA4-1 | Facility trains staff on suicide prevention strategies when they begin working |
100.0 |
VA4-2 |
Facility trains staff on suicide prevention strategies at regular intervals |
100.0 |
VA4-3 |
Facility doesn't train staff on suicide prevention strategies |
100.0 |
VA5-1 |
Facility implements indicated suicide risk screening program |
100.0 |
VA5-2 |
Facility implements selected suicide risk screening program |
100.0 |
VA5-3 |
Facility implements universal suicide risk screening program |
100.0 |
VA5-4 |
Facility doesn’t implement suicide risk screening programs |
100.0 |
VA6 |
Facility identifies warning signs for suicide and violence that clinicians should assess |
100.0 |
VA7 |
Facility assesses each client's level of risk for suicide to determine appropriate action |
100.0 |
VA8 |
Facility maintains a list of clients who are high risk for suicide |
100.0 |
VA8a |
Facility has a process for ensuring that high risk for suicide clients are followed up with when mental health or substance abuse appointments are missed |
100.0 |
VA9-a |
Number of full-time suicide prevention coordinators (SPCs) |
100.0 |
VA9-b |
Number of full-time care managers for high suicide risk clients |
100.0 |
VA9-c |
Number of full-time program support assistants for high suicide risk clients |
100.0 |
Appendix D. List of Contributors
This report was prepared for the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (CBHSQ), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), by Eagle Technologies, Inc. Data collection was performed by Mathematica Policy Research. Work was performed by Eagle and Mathematica under Contract No. HHSS283201600001C.
Contributors and reviewers at Eagle, listed alphabetically, include Anand Borse, Erin Doherty, Shanshan Hao, Alicia McCoy, David Peabody, Parth Thakore, Marty van Duym, Doren Walker (Project Director), and John Zuwasti Curran. Production of the report at SAMHSA was managed by Nichele Waller (COR). SAMHSA contributors and reviewers, listed alphabetically, include Herman Alvarado, Heydy Juarez, Sharon Liu, and Nichele Waller.