Go to the Table of Contents
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.1 – Illicit Drug Use in the Past Month and Illicit Drug Use Other Than Marijuana in the Past Month in Michigan among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Illicit Drug Use
in the Past Month
Illicit Drug Use Other Than
Marijuana in the Past Month
Estimate 95% Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95% Prediction
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
NOTE: Illicit Drugs include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically. Illicit Drugs Other Than Marijuana include cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically. These estimates include data from original methamphetamine questions but not including new methamphetamine items added in 2005 and 2006. See Section B.4.8 in Appendix B of the Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012).
Michigan 10.79 (10.05 - 11.59) 3.58 (3.18 - 4.03)
Detroit City 17.01 (14.31 - 20.10) 3.68 (2.71 - 4.97)
Genesee 11.53   (9.43 - 14.02) 3.63 (2.71 - 4.85)
Kalamazoo 10.37   (8.57 - 12.51) 3.37 (2.56 - 4.42)
Kent 10.24   (8.44 - 12.38) 3.77 (2.86 - 4.96)
Lakeshore   9.38   (7.80 - 11.25) 3.46 (2.68 - 4.46)
Macomb   9.29   (7.67 - 11.21) 3.21 (2.46 - 4.19)
Mid South 10.58   (8.87 - 12.58) 3.97 (3.10 - 5.07)
Northern 11.01   (9.19 - 13.13) 3.90 (3.00 - 5.05)
Oakland   9.62   (8.12 - 11.37) 3.24 (2.53 - 4.13)
Pathways and Western 13.05 (10.49 - 16.14) 3.30 (2.45 - 4.45)
Riverhaven 10.08   (8.04 - 12.59) 3.60 (2.64 - 4.88)
Saginaw 11.26   (8.82 - 14.26) 3.81 (2.74 - 5.29)
Southeast 10.93   (9.31 - 12.80) 3.81 (3.01 - 4.81)
St. Clair   9.42   (7.43 - 11.87) 3.67 (2.71 - 4.95)
Washtenaw   9.75   (8.05 - 11.78) 3.31 (2.52 - 4.33)
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.2 – Marijuana Use in the Past Month, Average Annual Rate of First Use of Marijuana, and Perceptions of Great Risk of Smoking Marijuana Once a Month in Michigan among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Marijuana Use
in the Past Month
Average Annual Rate of
First Use of Marijuana1
Perceptions of Great
Risk of Smoking
Marijuana Once a Month
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
1 Average annual marijuana initiation rate = 100 × {[X1 ÷ (0.5 × X1 + X2)] ÷ 2}, where X1 is the number of marijuana initiates in the past 24 months and X2 is the number of persons who never used marijuana. Both of the computation components, X1 and X2, are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach. Note that the age group is based on a respondent's age at the time of the interview, not his or her age at first use. The confidence intervals for Average Annual Rate of First Use of Marijuana use a simultaneous solution for First Use of Marijuana and Never Used Marijuana outcomes, which had age group-specific random effects that were allowed to be correlated across the two outcomes. The associated Markov Chain Monte Carlo chains were used to calculate the posterior variance.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012).
Michigan   8.74 (8.07 - 9.47) 2.23 (2.08 - 2.39) 26.99 (25.71 - 28.30)
Detroit City 13.59 (11.17 - 16.45) 2.90 (2.43 - 3.45) 32.60 (28.54 - 36.94)
Genesee   9.57   (7.67 - 11.89) 2.61 (2.13 - 3.19) 26.01 (22.36 - 30.03)
Kalamazoo   8.86   (7.06 - 11.05) 1.96 (1.60 - 2.39) 28.01 (24.48 - 31.85)
Kent   8.48   (6.81 - 10.51) 2.00 (1.64 - 2.44) 26.51 (23.08 - 30.26)
Lakeshore   7.52 (6.02 - 9.36) 2.14 (1.79 - 2.55) 30.58 (27.04 - 34.37)
Macomb   7.06 (5.73 - 8.67) 2.11 (1.77 - 2.51) 28.20 (24.91 - 31.75)
Mid South   8.27   (6.79 - 10.04) 2.34 (1.95 - 2.80) 23.32 (20.37 - 26.56)
Northern   9.06   (7.44 - 10.98) 2.52 (2.09 - 3.03) 23.80 (20.47 - 27.49)
Oakland   7.90 (6.56 - 9.48) 2.11 (1.79 - 2.48) 26.07 (23.07 - 29.31)
Pathways and Western 11.44   (9.04 - 14.38) 2.41 (1.88 - 3.07) 21.98 (18.22 - 26.28)
Riverhaven   7.93   (6.07 - 10.30) 1.49 (1.19 - 1.87) 27.97 (23.82 - 32.53)
Saginaw   8.74   (6.58 - 11.51) 2.20 (1.68 - 2.87) 27.66 (23.14 - 32.68)
Southeast   8.66   (7.22 - 10.36) 1.97 (1.67 - 2.31) 29.85 (26.80 - 33.09)
St. Clair   7.80   (5.92 - 10.23) 1.81 (1.42 - 2.31) 29.79 (25.20 - 34.83)
Washtenaw   8.20   (6.66 - 10.07) 3.01 (2.49 - 3.65) 20.83 (17.73 - 24.31)
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.3 – Marijuana Use in the Past Year, Cocaine Use in the Past Year, and Nonmedical Use of Pain Relievers in the Past Year in Michigan among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Marijuana Use
in the Past Year
Cocaine Use
in the Past Year
Nonmedical Use of Pain
Relievers in the Past Year
Estimate 95% Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012).
Michigan 13.62 (12.81 - 14.48) 1.33 (1.10 - 1.62) 5.14 (4.67 - 5.65)
Detroit City 19.10 (16.32 - 22.23) 1.63 (1.04 - 2.53) 4.59 (3.62 - 5.81)
Genesee 14.73 (12.35 - 17.49) 1.29 (0.90 - 1.83) 5.45 (4.31 - 6.87)
Kalamazoo 14.18 (11.91 - 16.79) 1.23 (0.89 - 1.69) 4.71 (3.73 - 5.95)
Kent 13.28 (11.22 - 15.66) 1.44 (1.04 - 1.98) 5.32 (4.28 - 6.59)
Lakeshore 12.78 (10.91 - 14.93) 1.23 (0.89 - 1.70) 5.65 (4.55 - 7.01)
Macomb 11.94 (10.21 - 13.91) 1.13 (0.82 - 1.56) 4.90 (3.94 - 6.07)
Mid South 13.68 (11.84 - 15.75) 1.41 (1.03 - 1.94) 5.50 (4.46 - 6.76)
Northern 13.44 (11.51 - 15.63) 1.33 (0.98 - 1.81) 5.57 (4.47 - 6.93)
Oakland 12.42 (10.76 - 14.30) 1.27 (0.95 - 1.70) 4.94 (3.99 - 6.09)
Pathways and Western 16.69 (13.91 - 19.90) 1.16 (0.82 - 1.64) 4.75 (3.65 - 6.16)
Riverhaven 11.80   (9.55 - 14.51) 1.34 (0.95 - 1.89) 5.26 (4.10 - 6.73)
Saginaw 14.00 (11.26 - 17.28) 1.46 (1.00 - 2.13) 5.33 (4.10 - 6.92)
Southeast 13.38 (11.58 - 15.41) 1.47 (1.06 - 2.02) 5.15 (4.22 - 6.28)
St. Clair 11.75   (9.55 - 14.37) 1.11 (0.78 - 1.59) 5.33 (4.14 - 6.84)
Washtenaw 12.95 (11.06 - 15.11) 1.34 (0.98 - 1.83) 4.65 (3.62 - 5.94)
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.4 – Alcohol Use in the Past Month, Binge Alcohol Use in the Past Month, and Perceptions of Great Risk of Having Five or More Drinks of an Alcoholic Beverage Once or Twice a Week in Michigan among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Alcohol Use
in the Past Month
Binge Alcohol Use
in the Past Month1
Perceptions of Great
Risk of Having Five or
More Drinks of an
Alcoholic Beverage
Once or Twice a Week
Estimate 95%
Prediction Interval
Estimate 95% Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
1 Binge Alcohol Use is defined as drinking five or more drinks on the same occasion (i.e., at the same time or within a couple of hours of each other) on at least 1 day in the past 30 days.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012).
Michigan 53.80 (52.44 - 55.16) 25.23 (24.05 - 26.45) 39.51 (38.16 - 40.88)
Detroit City 38.13 (34.06 - 42.38) 21.04 (18.13 - 24.29) 51.29 (47.55 - 55.02)
Genesee 50.95 (46.40 - 55.50) 23.12 (19.98 - 26.59) 38.58 (34.66 - 42.65)
Kalamazoo 53.30 (48.87 - 57.68) 25.33 (22.30 - 28.63) 39.84 (36.15 - 43.65)
Kent 56.81 (52.88 - 60.66) 26.92 (23.73 - 30.37) 41.72 (38.00 - 45.55)
Lakeshore 51.98 (48.07 - 55.86) 24.72 (21.83 - 27.85) 38.00 (34.57 - 41.55)
Macomb 60.02 (56.31 - 63.62) 26.44 (23.51 - 29.59) 39.75 (36.38 - 43.22)
Mid South 53.97 (50.33 - 57.56) 25.43 (22.67 - 28.39) 34.88 (31.69 - 38.21)
Northern 55.34 (51.10 - 59.50) 26.16 (23.07 - 29.52) 34.65 (31.16 - 38.31)
Oakland 58.31 (54.91 - 61.63) 24.75 (22.17 - 27.53) 39.93 (36.65 - 43.29)
Pathways and Western 55.28 (50.14 - 60.31) 28.92 (25.24 - 32.90) 36.61 (32.65 - 40.75)
Riverhaven 54.48 (49.48 - 59.39) 28.45 (24.66 - 32.58) 36.15 (32.14 - 40.35)
Saginaw 52.57 (46.72 - 58.35) 26.09 (22.12 - 30.50) 38.65 (34.13 - 43.38)
Southeast 51.81 (48.38 - 55.23) 24.64 (22.07 - 27.42) 41.10 (37.94 - 44.32)
St. Clair 50.84 (45.61 - 56.04) 22.78 (19.53 - 26.39) 39.64 (35.34 - 44.10)
Washtenaw 58.04 (53.81 - 62.16) 26.26 (23.23 - 29.53) 39.54 (35.88 - 43.31)
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.5 – Alcohol Use in the Past Month and Binge Alcohol Use in the Past Month among Persons Aged 12 to 20 in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Alcohol Use in the Past Month
among Persons Aged 12 to 20
Binge Alcohol Use in the Past Month
among Persons Aged 12 to 201
Estimate 95% Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95% Prediction
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
1 Binge Alcohol Use is defined as drinking five or more drinks on the same occasion (i.e., at the same time or within a couple of hours of each other) on at least 1 day in the past 30 days.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012).
Michigan 25.79 (24.63 - 26.98) 16.89 (15.93 - 17.89)
Detroit City 19.39 (16.63 - 22.48) 9.91 (8.04 - 12.14)
Genesee 23.92 (20.50 - 27.71) 15.59 (12.93 - 18.67)
Kalamazoo 25.84 (22.57 - 29.39) 18.13 (15.29 - 21.37)
Kent 24.24 (21.19 - 27.58) 15.92 (13.33 - 18.91)
Lakeshore 24.40 (21.28 - 27.81) 15.95 (13.41 - 18.87)
Macomb 25.28 (22.31 - 28.50) 16.68 (14.28 - 19.39)
Mid South 28.71 (25.52 - 32.12) 18.82 (16.02 - 21.99)
Northern 30.22 (26.73 - 33.96) 20.80 (17.89 - 24.04)
Oakland 25.79 (23.11 - 28.66) 15.41 (13.25 - 17.85)
Pathways and Western 33.42 (29.29 - 37.81) 25.42 (21.48 - 29.80)
Riverhaven 26.81 (23.04 - 30.95) 18.88 (15.76 - 22.45)
Saginaw 27.30 (22.82 - 32.29) 18.29 (14.87 - 22.30)
Southeast 22.76 (20.39 - 25.31) 15.80 (13.77 - 18.06)
St. Clair 23.74 (19.97 - 27.97) 14.65 (11.94 - 17.85)
Washtenaw 31.69 (28.52 - 35.03) 20.65 (17.73 - 23.92)
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.6 – Cigarette Use in the Past Month, Tobacco Product Use in the Past Month, and Perceptions of Great Risk of Smoking One or More Packs of Cigarettes per Day in Michigan among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Cigarette Use
in the Past Month
Tobacco Product Use
in the Past Month1
Perceptions of Great
Risk of Smoking One or
More Packs of Cigarettes
per Day
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
1 Tobacco Products include cigarettes, smokeless tobacco (i.e., chewing tobacco or snuff), cigars, or pipe tobacco.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012).
Michigan 26.04 (24.83 - 27.29) 30.66 (29.42 - 31.92) 67.93 (66.67 - 69.17)
Detroit City 28.74 (25.37 - 32.36) 31.65 (28.22 - 35.30) 69.07 (65.67 - 72.27)
Genesee 27.92 (24.60 - 31.50) 33.61 (30.01 - 37.42) 64.86 (60.94 - 68.59)
Kalamazoo 25.73 (22.59 - 29.15) 29.62 (26.15 - 33.34) 65.79 (62.28 - 69.13)
Kent 25.57 (22.71 - 28.66) 31.41 (28.08 - 34.95) 70.39 (67.14 - 73.45)
Lakeshore 27.38 (24.54 - 30.41) 31.78 (28.58 - 35.15) 66.85 (63.65 - 69.90)
Macomb 26.76 (23.99 - 29.73) 31.51 (28.38 - 34.81) 69.21 (65.95 - 72.28)
Mid South 28.04 (25.21 - 31.06) 32.43 (29.37 - 35.64) 66.29 (63.08 - 69.36)
Northern 28.22 (25.13 - 31.53) 33.42 (30.17 - 36.83) 65.72 (62.25 - 69.04)
Oakland 21.01 (18.68 - 23.54) 25.38 (22.80 - 28.15) 72.54 (69.70 - 75.20)
Pathways and Western 27.50 (23.94 - 31.38) 32.56 (28.62 - 36.75) 64.70 (60.50 - 68.69)
Riverhaven 29.59 (25.92 - 33.54) 33.90 (29.95 - 38.10) 61.71 (57.48 - 65.77)
Saginaw 27.81 (23.92 - 32.07) 31.80 (27.47 - 36.47) 65.54 (61.06 - 69.75)
Southeast 25.77 (23.14 - 28.60) 30.42 (27.63 - 33.37) 69.39 (66.44 - 72.19)
St. Clair 28.23 (24.61 - 32.16) 32.45 (28.57 - 36.58) 65.02 (60.75 - 69.06)
Washtenaw 19.17 (16.59 - 22.04) 25.03 (22.10 - 28.20) 69.38 (65.81 - 72.73)
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.7 – Alcohol Dependence in the Past Year and Illicit Drug Dependence in the Past Year in Michigan among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Alcohol Dependence
in the Past Year
Illicit Drug Dependence
in the Past Year1
Estimate 95% Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95% Prediction
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
NOTE: Dependence is based on the definition found in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV).
1 Illicit Drugs include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically, including data from original methamphetamine questions but not including new methamphetamine items added in 2005 and 2006. See Section B.4.8 in Appendix B of the Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012).
Michigan 3.48 (3.05 - 3.97) 1.92 (1.68 - 2.20)
Detroit City 4.11 (3.01 - 5.59) 3.18 (2.28 - 4.41)
Genesee 3.03 (2.15 - 4.26) 1.99 (1.45 - 2.72)
Kalamazoo 3.02 (2.16 - 4.21) 1.89 (1.43 - 2.49)
Kent 3.89 (2.87 - 5.25) 2.12 (1.59 - 2.83)
Lakeshore 3.89 (2.88 - 5.23) 1.58 (1.16 - 2.13)
Macomb 3.60 (2.65 - 4.87) 1.57 (1.18 - 2.08)
Mid South 3.33 (2.51 - 4.40) 1.84 (1.39 - 2.44)
Northern 3.30 (2.42 - 4.49) 1.64 (1.24 - 2.16)
Oakland 3.26 (2.46 - 4.31) 1.64 (1.26 - 2.14)
Pathways and Western 3.73 (2.68 - 5.18) 1.68 (1.20 - 2.35)
Riverhaven 3.70 (2.67 - 5.10) 1.69 (1.24 - 2.32)
Saginaw 3.19 (2.25 - 4.52) 1.94 (1.37 - 2.74)
Southeast 3.45 (2.60 - 4.56) 2.36 (1.82 - 3.05)
St. Clair 3.14 (2.19 - 4.50) 1.51 (1.08 - 2.10)
Washtenaw 3.53 (2.62 - 4.74) 1.85 (1.39 - 2.46)
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.8 – Alcohol Dependence or Abuse in the Past Year, Illicit Drug Dependence or Abuse in the Past Year, and Dependence or Abuse of Illicit Drugs or Alcohol in the Past Year in Michigan among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Alcohol Dependence or
Abuse in the Past Year
Illicit Drug Dependence
or Abuse in the Past
Year1
Dependence or
Abuse of Illicit Drugs
or Alcohol in the Past
Year1
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95%
Prediction
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
NOTE: Dependence or abuse is based on definitions found in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV).
1 Illicit Drugs include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically, including data from original methamphetamine questions but not including new methamphetamine items added in 2005 and 2006. See Section B.4.8 in Appendix B of the Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012).
Michigan 7.05 (6.43 - 7.73) 2.77 (2.46 - 3.11) 8.74 (8.07 - 9.46)
Detroit City 7.11 (5.60 - 9.00) 4.53 (3.46 - 5.92) 10.04   (8.16 - 12.28)
Genesee 6.17 (4.77 - 7.94) 2.79 (2.17 - 3.59) 7.91 (6.31 - 9.87)
Kalamazoo 6.48 (5.11 - 8.20) 2.64 (2.10 - 3.30) 8.22   (6.67 - 10.11)
Kent 8.12   (6.52 - 10.06) 2.72 (2.15 - 3.43) 9.94   (8.19 - 12.03)
Lakeshore 7.42 (5.98 - 9.18) 2.48 (1.97 - 3.12) 8.99   (7.44 - 10.84)
Macomb 7.71 (6.22 - 9.51) 2.39 (1.90 - 3.00) 9.02   (7.43 - 10.91)
Mid South 6.26 (5.04 - 7.75) 2.59 (2.05 - 3.28) 7.88 (6.52 - 9.50)
Northern 6.71 (5.35 - 8.39) 2.36 (1.88 - 2.95) 8.26   (6.73 - 10.12)
Oakland 7.25 (5.93 - 8.83) 2.60 (2.12 - 3.18) 8.44   (7.04 - 10.09)
Pathways and Western 9.32   (7.29 - 11.83) 2.71 (2.10 - 3.50) 11.10   (8.87 - 13.80)
Riverhaven 7.00 (5.37 - 9.08) 2.48 (1.92 - 3.20) 8.88   (7.01 - 11.20)
Saginaw 6.30 (4.80 - 8.24) 2.99 (2.26 - 3.93) 8.36   (6.40 - 10.85)
Southeast 6.70 (5.44 - 8.22) 3.11 (2.51 - 3.83) 8.44   (7.08 - 10.04)
St. Clair 5.93 (4.56 - 7.67) 2.37 (1.85 - 3.03) 7.91   (6.20 - 10.03)
Washtenaw 7.55 (6.10 - 9.31) 2.61 (2.07 - 3.27) 9.05   (7.45 - 10.94)
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.9 – Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Alcohol Use in the Past Year and Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Illicit Drug Use in the Past Year in Michigan among Persons Aged 12 or Older, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Needing But Not Receiving Treatment
for Alcohol Use in the Past Year1
Needing But Not Receiving Treatment
for Illicit Drug Use in the Past Year2
Estimate 95% Prediction
Interval
Estimate 95% Prediction
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
1 Needing But Not Receiving Treatment refers to respondents classified as needing treatment for alcohol, but not receiving treatment for an alcohol problem at a specialty facility (i.e., drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities [inpatient or outpatient], hospitals [inpatient only], or mental health centers).
2 Needing But Not Receiving Treatment refers to respondents classified as needing treatment for illicit drugs, but not receiving treatment for an illicit drug problem at a specialty facility (i.e., drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities [inpatient or outpatient], hospitals [inpatient only], or mental health centers). Illicit Drugs include marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or prescription-type psychotherapeutics used nonmedically, including data from original methamphetamine questions but not including new methamphetamine items added in 2005 and 2006. See Section B.4.8 in the Appendix B of the Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012).
Michigan 6.72 (6.12 - 7.37) 2.40 (2.12 - 2.71)
Detroit City 6.50 (4.96 - 8.47) 4.35 (3.27 - 5.76)
Genesee 6.08 (4.67 - 7.88) 2.44 (1.85 - 3.20)
Kalamazoo 6.04 (4.72 - 7.71) 2.33 (1.80 - 3.01)
Kent 8.09   (6.34 - 10.25) 2.41 (1.89 - 3.07)
Lakeshore 7.21 (5.70 - 9.07) 2.15 (1.65 - 2.79)
Macomb 7.48 (5.96 - 9.34) 2.00 (1.57 - 2.56)
Mid South 6.07 (4.86 - 7.54) 2.25 (1.77 - 2.86)
Northern 6.24 (4.88 - 7.93) 1.95 (1.53 - 2.49)
Oakland 6.55 (5.27 - 8.11) 2.21 (1.78 - 2.75)
Pathways and Western 8.29   (6.35 - 10.74) 2.29 (1.72 - 3.06)
Riverhaven 7.00 (5.31 - 9.18) 2.17 (1.65 - 2.85)
Saginaw 6.09 (4.48 - 8.23) 2.58 (1.89 - 3.52)
Southeast 6.50 (5.26 - 8.01) 2.50 (1.97 - 3.17)
St. Clair 5.83 (4.39 - 7.70) 2.07 (1.59 - 2.69)
Washtenaw 7.39 (5.88 - 9.26) 2.35 (1.86 - 2.98)
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.10 – Serious Mental Illness in the Past Year and Any Mental Illness in the Past Year in Michigan among Persons Aged 18 or Older, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Serious Mental Illness in the Past
Year1
Any Mental Illness in the Past Year2
Estimate 95% Confidence
Interval
Estimate 95% Confidence
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
1 Serious mental illness is defined as having a diagnosable mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder, other than a substance use disorder, that met the criteria found in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) and resulted in serious functional impairment. For details, see Section B in the "2011-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Guide to State Tables and Summary of Small Area Estimation Methodology" at http://samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2k12State/NSDUHsae2012/Index.aspx.
2 Any mental illness is defined as having a diagnosable mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder, other than a substance use disorder, that met the criteria found in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). For details, see Section B in the "2011-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Guide to State Tables and Summary of Small Area Estimation Methodology" at http://samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2k12State/NSDUHsae2012/Index.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012 and October 2013; 2011 Data – Revised October 2013).
Michigan 4.45 (3.92 - 5.05) 20.05 (18.91 - 21.24)
Detroit City 4.27 (3.08 - 5.89) 21.19 (18.20 - 24.52)
Genesee 4.81 (3.52 - 6.53) 20.75 (17.70 - 24.16)
Kalamazoo 4.73 (3.52 - 6.34) 20.35 (17.49 - 23.54)
Kent 4.48 (3.34 - 5.98) 18.30 (15.62 - 21.33)
Lakeshore 4.64 (3.50 - 6.14) 19.31 (16.76 - 22.16)
Macomb 4.17 (3.12 - 5.55) 18.56 (15.86 - 21.60)
Mid South 4.35 (3.27 - 5.77) 22.56 (19.68 - 25.72)
Northern 4.65 (3.45 - 6.26) 18.92 (16.22 - 21.95)
Oakland 4.23 (3.19 - 5.59) 19.54 (17.04 - 22.30)
Pathways and Western 5.47 (3.96 - 7.51) 21.29 (17.94 - 25.07)
Riverhaven 5.04 (3.64 - 6.95) 21.95 (18.66 - 25.64)
Saginaw 4.47 (3.16 - 6.29) 20.01 (16.72 - 23.77)
Southeast 4.18 (3.15 - 5.53) 20.23 (17.71 - 23.02)
St. Clair 4.82 (3.48 - 6.63) 20.80 (17.38 - 24.69)
Washtenaw 3.94 (2.90 - 5.33) 18.72 (16.02 - 21.77)
140208

MICHIGAN

Table 23.11 – Had Serious Thoughts of Suicide in the Past Year and Had at Least One Major Depressive Episode in the Past Year in Michigan among Persons Aged 18 or Older, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs
State/Substate Region Had Serious Thoughts of Suicide
in the Past Year
Had at Least One Major Depressive
Episode in the Past Year1
Estimate 95% Confidence
Interval
Estimate 95% Confidence
Interval
NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
NOTE: Estimates along with the 95 percent Bayesian confidence (credible) intervals are based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques.
1 Major depressive episode (MDE) is defined as in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), which specifies a period of at least 2 weeks when a person experienced a depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure in daily activities and had a majority of specified depression symptoms. For details, see Section B in the "2011-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Guide to State Tables and Summary of Small Area Estimation Methodology" at http://samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2k12State/NSDUHsae2012/Index.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data – Revised March 2012).
Michigan 4.46 (3.96 - 5.02) 7.20 (6.53 - 7.94)
Detroit City 4.35 (3.35 - 5.63) 6.45 (4.90 - 8.45)
Genesee 4.91 (3.76 - 6.39) 7.46 (5.64 - 9.81)
Kalamazoo 4.43 (3.45 - 5.67) 7.93   (6.17 - 10.12)
Kent 4.28 (3.34 - 5.47) 6.07 (4.67 - 7.87)
Lakeshore 4.46 (3.49 - 5.70) 7.88 (6.22 - 9.94)
Macomb 4.52 (3.49 - 5.84) 6.51 (5.01 - 8.41)
Mid South 4.79 (3.81 - 5.99) 7.47 (5.93 - 9.38)
Northern 4.53 (3.48 - 5.88) 6.84 (5.31 - 8.78)
Oakland 3.87 (3.01 - 4.96) 7.38 (5.82 - 9.32)
Pathways and Western 4.60 (3.51 - 6.01) 8.20   (6.15 - 10.84)
Riverhaven 4.67 (3.48 - 6.23) 7.94   (6.00 - 10.45)
Saginaw 4.47 (3.37 - 5.90) 6.91 (5.09 - 9.31)
Southeast 4.73 (3.75 - 5.96) 7.22 (5.82 - 8.94)
St. Clair 4.59 (3.49 - 6.03) 6.96 (5.17 - 9.30)
Washtenaw 4.18 (3.27 - 5.32) 7.30 (5.65 - 9.38)

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.1 Illicit Drug Use in the Past Month among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.1

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.2 Marijuana Use in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.2

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.3 Marijuana Use in the Past Month among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.3

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.4 Perceptions of Great Risk of Smoking Marijuana Once a Month among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.4

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.5 First Use of Marijuana among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Average Annual Rates Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.5

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.6 Illicit Drug Use Other Than Marijuana in the Past Month among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.6

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.7 Cocaine Use in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.7

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.8 Nonmedical Use of Pain Relievers in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.8

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.9 Alcohol Use in the Past Month among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.9

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.10 Binge Alcohol Use in the Past Month among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.10

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.11 Perceptions of Great Risk of Having Five or More Drinks of an Alcoholic Beverage Once or Twice a Week among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.11

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.12 Alcohol Use in the Past Month among Persons Aged 12 to 20 in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.12

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.13 Binge Alcohol Use in the Past Month among Persons Aged 12 to 20 in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.13

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.14 Tobacco Product Use in the Past Month among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.14

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.15 Cigarette Use in the Past Month among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.15

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.16 Perceptions of Great Risk of Smoking One or More Packs of Cigarettes per Day among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.16

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.17 Alcohol Dependence or Abuse in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.17

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.18 Alcohol Dependence in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.18

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.19 Illicit Drug Dependence or Abuse in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.19

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.20 Illicit Drug Dependence in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.20

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.21 Dependence or Abuse of Illicit Drugs or Alcohol in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.21

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.22 Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Illicit Drug Use in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.22

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.23 Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Alcohol Use in the Past Year among Persons Aged 12 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.23

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.24 Serious Mental Illness in the Past Year among Persons Aged 18 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.24

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012 and October 2013; 2011 Data - Revised October 2013).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.25 Any Mental Illness in the Past Year among Persons Aged 18 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.25

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012 and October 2013; 2011 Data - Revised October 2013).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.26 Had Serious Thoughts of Suicide in the Past Year among Persons Aged 18 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.26

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Below is a map. Click here for the text describing this map.

Figure 23.27 Had at Least One Major Depressive Episode in the Past Year among Persons Aged 18 or Older in Michigan, by Substate Region: Percentages, Annual Averages Based on 2010, 2011, and 2012 NSDUHs

Figure 23.27

NOTE: The legend's ranges were created by dividing 363 substate regions, nationally, into 7 groups based on the magnitude of their percentages. For substate region definitions, see the "2010-2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/substate2k12/toc.aspx.
Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2010, 2011, and 2012 (2010 Data - Revised March 2012).

Go to Top of PageGo to the Table of Contents